从阿富汗撤军的理由
从阿富汗撤军的理由
尼克-图斯, 塔里克-阿里, 安德鲁-巴切维奇, 多米尼克-巴里, 罗德里克-布雷思韦特, 普拉塔普-查特吉, 胡安-科尔, 罗伯特-克鲁斯, 罗伯特-德雷福斯, 汤姆-恩格尔哈特, 格雷厄姆-E-富勒, 查默斯-约翰逊, 安-琼斯, 马拉莱-乔亚, 奥列格-瓦西里耶维奇-库斯托夫, 拉蒂夫-佩德拉姆
5.0 / 4.0 0 评论
阿富汗被称为帝国的坟场，现在已经被挑出来作为奥巴马的 "正义战争"，是增派三万名美军的目的地，目的是为了巩固日益绝望的占领。尼克-图斯（Nick Turse）汇集了一系列领先的评论家、政治家和军事战略家，分析了美国的真正动机和可能的前景。通过现场报道、清晰的分析以及与阿富汗以前的占领者--英国和苏联--的历史比较，他们也认为自己是在打一场正义的、可以获胜的战争，《从阿富汗撤军的案例》仔细研究了美国目前的战略，并提出了清醒的结论。这本及时而集中的文集瞄准了奥巴马外交政策的核心，并说明了为什么它不太可能成功。
The Case for Withdrawal from Afghanistan
Nick Turse, Tariq Ali, Andrew J. Bacevich, Dominique Bari, Rodric Braithwaite, Pratap Chatterjee, Juan Cole, Robert Crews, Robert Dreyfuss, Tom Engelhardt, Graham E. Fuller, Chalmers Johnson, Ann Jones, Malalai Joya, Oleg Vasilevich Kustov, Latif Pedram
5.0 / 4.0 0 comments
Known as the graveyard of empires, Afghanistan has now been singled out as Obama’s “just war,” the destination for an additional thirty thousand US troops in an effort to shore up an increasingly desperate occupation. Nick Turse brings together a range of leading commentators, politicians, and military strategists to analyze America’s real motives and likely prospects. Through on-the-spot reporting, clear-headed analysis and historical comparisons with Afghanistan’s previous occupiers—Britain and the Soviet Union, who also argued that they were fighting a just and winnable war—The Case for Withdrawal From Afghanistan carefully examines the current US strategy and offers sobering conclusions. This timely and focused collection aims at the heart of Obama’s foreign policy and shows why it is so unlikely to succeed.
留言
張貼留言