反猶太主義與反烏克蘭主義一樣,都是莫斯科蘇聯宣傳的本土內容。




觀看次數:937
反猶太主義與反烏克蘭主義一樣,都是莫斯科蘇聯宣傳的本土內容。雖然目前俄羅斯宣傳試圖將烏克蘭自由戰士描繪成“反猶太主義者”,但在 1970 年代,莫斯科曾指責他們是“親猶太主義者”和“猶太復國主義者”。這裡:蘇聯漫畫:影像影像影像
蘇聯是一個極端反猶太主義的國家,官方推行反猶太主義(猶太族人被禁止從事許多工作或接受多種類型的大學教育)。以下是莫斯科類似納粹的共產主義反猶太主義的更多例子:影像影像影像影像
更多蘇聯反猶太漫畫:影像影像影像影像
更多蘇聯反猶太漫畫(數量眾多):影像影像影像影像
還有更多蘇聯反猶太主義和反烏克蘭漫畫:影像
@提及- hier ein Thread zu sowjetischer antisemitischen UND antiukrainischen Propaganda (gleichzeitig!) Die Sowjets hatten ihren Hass gegen Israel UND Kiew gleichzeitig。 Ein klarer Fundament for die aktuelle Politik Moskaus。
這裡有更多蘇聯反猶太漫畫。猶太人被比作猴子,並被指責為「新納粹分子」(這裡有一幅漫畫:一名「猶太復國主義者」正在研究他「想為」巴勒斯坦人建造的納粹死亡集中營的建設計劃)。蘇聯創造了當代西方反猶太主義影像影像影像

• • •

錯過了本主題中的一些推文嗎?您可以嘗試 強制刷新
 

與法學碩士 Sergej Sumlenny 保持同步

Sergej Sumlenny,法學碩士 個人檔案圖片

保持聯繫並在該作者推出新作品時收到通知!

 此主題可能隨時被刪除!

PDF

Twitter 可能隨時刪除此內容!將其儲存為 PDF 以供以後使用!

試試自己展開一條線!

如何展開視頻
  1. 追蹤@ThreadReaderApp並提及我們!

  2. 在 Twitter 帖子中提及我們並添加關鍵字“unroll”
@threadreaderapp unroll

先在這裡練習或在我們的幫助頁面上閱讀更多內容!

更多來自 @sumlenny 的信息

4月15日
THREAD What we witness now from the White House, is a clear smearing campaign aimed not only at @ZelenskyyUa but on Ukraine at whole. Zelensky is being used as a target, but with a goal to weaken Ukraine in whole, and to strengthen Moscow. Let me explain: 👇影像
President @ZelenskyyUa was verbally attacked by President Trump many times, with the following four main accusation lines: a) Zelensky is ungrateful b) Zelensky is corrupt c) Zelensky is a dictator d) Zelensky has started the war / is interested in war. Nothing is true. 2/x👇
@ZelenskyyUa President Zelensky has thanked the U.S. people dozens of times for the help provided. "Corruption" is a typical russian lie, used also by russia-friendly voices, who claimed with no proves that Ukraine-delivered arms were "stolen". But let us address other accusations 3/x👇影像影像影像
Read 9 tweets
Apr 14
Some thoughts on recent russian missile attacks on Ukrainian cities 1) russia is facing a huge and growing problem with its offensive slowing down, unsustainably high losses, and even some Ukrainian counter-offensive in Pokrovsk region; 2) russia uses two tactics to counter it:👇
3) First, russia starts "negotiations". The goal is to slow Ukraine down, to limit Ukrainian striking freedom (ban Ukrainian strikes on the Black Sea navy, on russian oil refineries etc.), while accumulating military power; 4) Second, russia increases PsyOps against Ukraine. 👇
4.1) russia's missile strikes on Ukraine's cities are demonstratively brutal: ballistic missiles with cluster munition warheads aiming civilians' gatherings, incl. children playgrounds; 4.2) at the same time, russia spreads false info that they have targeted military personnel👇
Read 6 tweets
Mar 3
THREAD: Ok, let us have a sober look at the U.S. - Ukraine - Russia - EU constellation. First: the U.S. - Ukraine agreement was not necessary for Ukraine. It was not necessary for the U.S. as well. It was necessary only for Trump, therefore he is vulnerable. Let me explain. /1
The "agreement" didn't provide Ukraine with anything. It was aimed on payment for the U.S. from Ukraine (and practically allowed the U.S. to mine Ukrainian resources on Russia-occupied lands). Trump needed it to prove that he is a great dealer. But why did Ukraine need it? /2
The agreement did not foresee any U.S. military support, guarantees, even "commitments". Ukraine paid retrospective for what they have got for free. So for Ukraine, it was a pure cost factor, for Trump - pure profit factor. And he needed it asap. Therefore - he was vulnerable. /3
Read 8 tweets
Jan 26
In four weeks, Feb. 23rd, Germany will have preliminary elections. In this THREAD I will try to explain what it is about, who would probably win, where are bottlenecks, and what it means for the world and for Ukraine. /1 ⬇️影像
First, we need to understand: German electoral system is designed to dilute votes. No job higher than a city mayor gets elected directly. The reason is the Nazi past: no politician may claim being elected by the PEOPLE. So people vote for parties, and they name politicians. /2⬇️
So people vote for parties, and parties need 50%+1 vote to name a head of a region, or a chancellor. Normally, no party gets over 50%, so a coalition is needed (on a federal level, conservatives from the CDU under Adenauer have got 50,2% in 1957, but still formed a coalition)/3⬇️影像
Read 28 tweets
Jan 25
Yesterday in Davos, Germany's guru diplomat and Merkel's minion @ischinger made some absolutely crazy statements, effectively urging for occupation of Ukraine by BRICS countries (and promoted his wife's book in the beginning). In this THREAD I explain why this was terrible /1 ⬇️ 
Let us deconstruct Ischinger step by step. First, he claims Western peace troops in Ukraine must follow a rule "all in - all out". Who told you so? NATO countries supported Ukraine on their own all the time. Had we waited for Hungary and Scholz, 🇺🇦 would never get anything /2 ⬇️ 
Second. Ischinger claims, European NATO troops may not be sent, because they would automatically and never be able to fight without a presence of the U.S. troops. Hallo, Ischi, ever asked how Ukrainian troops fight quite successfully without the U.S. troops on the ground? /2 ⬇️ 
Read 10 tweets
Nov 22, 2024
A THREAD: Our 2024 #ChristmasDrones campaign is running! Why it is important, and how we at the @EuroResilience deliver donated goods directly to the frontline? Get insight from this THREAD (And a donation link: ) /1paypal.com/donate?campaig…
During our last donation campaign by @EuroResilience @BrennpunktUA and @frontlinekit, we have raised €277,000. For this money, we have produced hundreds of drones, and bought addition equipment for the drones units: off-the-shelf drones, cars, antennas, power stations. /2影像影像影像影像
@EuroResilience @BrennpunktUA @frontlinekit I personally traveled days through Ukraine, bringing equipment directly to the frontline. When you stay at the units, sleep in their premises, eat with soldiers, and escape Russian drones attacks, this creates bonds. Soldiers tell you what they REALLY need, and trust you. /3影像影像影像影像
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

 Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

透過給我們買咖啡(5 美元)或幫助支付服務員費用(10 美元)進行小額捐贈

透過 Paypal 捐款

或使用加密貨幣匿名捐贈!

以太坊

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E 複製

比特幣

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi 複製

 謝謝您的支持! 

透過電子郵件發送

沒有留言:

張貼留言

注意:只有此網誌的成員可以留言。

選擇汪精衛中華帝國會像奧匈帝國鄂圖曼土耳其帝國一樣戰敗解體

選擇汪精衛 中華帝國會像奧匈帝國鄂圖曼土耳其帝國一樣戰敗解體 因為站錯了隊伍 北洋軍閥頭腦比汪精衛清楚 所以一戰才能拿回山東 孫文拿德國錢,他是反對參加一戰 選擇蔣介石, 中國將淪為共產主義國家 因為蔣介石鬥不過史達林 蔣介石即使打贏毛澤東 中國一樣會解體 中國是靠偽裝民族主義的...