深入剖析2025年美國國家安全戰略

國防部長皮特·赫格塞斯週六對後冷戰時期的美國外交政策發起了猛烈抨擊，點名批評了多位前總統和將軍，並宣布美國“烏托邦理想主義”的時代已經結束。

赫格塞斯在一年一度的雷根國防論壇上發表講話，概述了美國對西半球的新軍事重點，要求盟友自力更生，並對中國軍隊採取了更和解的態度。

赫格塞斯宣布美國「烏托邦理想主義」終結，並提出新的軍事戰略

美國根本哪兒也沒去，只是把它的代理人網絡擴大，變成它自己所說的「負擔分擔網絡」（burden-sharing network），而且這個網絡仍由美國掌控、美國支持，以避免美國自身過度延伸。

「延續川普總統的做法，要求盟友對其所在地區承擔主要責任，美國將組織一個負擔分擔網絡，由我國政府擔任召集者和支持者。

這種做法確保負擔得到分擔，並使所有努力獲得更廣泛的正當性。

要求歐洲和美國在亞洲的代理人「建立分工，各自在歐洲和太平洋發揮比較優勢」。

😅😅😅😅😅😀

深入剖析2025年美國國家安全戰略… 99

我反覆看到有人把最新的《美國國家安全戰略》說成是「重大轉向」，包括俄羅斯的RT在內，都說美國正在「遠離」與俄羅斯甚至中國的衝突，轉而聚焦「西半球」。

這些人顯然根本沒把這份33頁的文件完整讀過，只是挑出自己想聽、想相信的幾段話來斷章取義。

這裡有幾段他們不願意提的、更「不方便」的原文，直接證明美國根本哪兒也沒去，只是把它的代理人網絡擴大，變成它自己所說的「負擔分擔網絡」（burden-sharing network），而且這個網絡仍由美國掌控、美國支持，以避免美國自身過度延伸。

最新戰略文件中寫道：

「延續川普總統的做法，要求盟友對其所在地區承擔主要責任，美國將組織一個負擔分擔網絡，由我國政府擔任召集者和支持者。

這種做法確保負擔得到分擔，並使所有努力獲得更廣泛的正當性。

模式將是針對性的夥伴關係，利用經濟工具來協調各方利益、與志同道合的盟友分擔負擔，並堅持要求進行改革，以奠定長期穩定。這一戰略清晰度將使美國能夠高效應對敵對與顛覆性影響，同時避免過去因過度延伸和焦點分散而失敗的努力。」

聽懂了嗎？這個網絡的目的是讓美國「應對敵對與顛覆性影響」，你覺得他們說的敵對勢力是誰？俄羅斯、中國、伊朗……還用問嗎？

這根本就是國防部長皮特·赫格塞斯（Pete Hegseth）今年2月在布魯塞尔講的那套「分工」理論的進化版，他當時要求歐洲和美國在亞洲的代理人「建立分工，各自在歐洲和太平洋發揮比較優勢」。

（來源：https://www.war.gov/News/Speeches）

關於中國的部分，國家安全戰略明確寫道：

「我們將建立一支能够在第一島鏈任何地方拒止侵略的軍事力量。但美國軍隊不能也不應該獨自承擔這一切。我們的盟友必須站出來，花更多錢——更重要的是要做更多事——來進行集體防禦。美國的外交努力應專注於敦促第一島鏈的盟友和夥伴允許美軍更大程度使用他們的港口和其他設施、增加自身國防開支，最重要的是投資於旨在威懾侵略的能力。」

除非第一島鏈已經不知不覺搬到了西半球，否則這段話的意思就是：美國不僅會繼續把目前在亞洲的數萬駐軍留在那裡，還要擴大駐軍規模，同時逼迫區域內的代理人把更多公共資金拿去執行美國對中國的圍堵政策。

整份文件充滿了這種自相矛盾：一方面宣稱要尊重民族國家的首要地位，一方面又要求全球各大區域必須按美國說跟誰合作就跟誰、按美國說的方式做事。

文件說要結束烏克蘭衝突，同時又要求歐洲準備好對抗某個「試圖主導歐洲的對手」（明擺著說俄羅斯）。

什麼都沒變，也不可能變。驅動美國權力及其與世界關係的物質現實，是華盛頓背後的企業-金融利益集團，而不是華盛頓嘴上說的那些空話。

如果你仔細、完整地讀這份文件，就會發現連文件自己都承認了這一點。

所以請醒醒吧！別再斷章取義、別再只看自己想看的東西了——學會分辨哪些是場面話，哪些才是真正延續既定議程的政策。請把眼前這份文件真正讀完。

完整《國家安全戰略》下載連結：

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content...

來自：The New Atlas（Brian Berletic）

#地緣政治

《The Last Stand of the Sa...》

1小時前 ⋅ 查看翻譯

2則評論

Camer  

羅馬帝國已經走到了最後，它的結局將比當年羅馬向西方列強擴張時還要糟糕。  

14小時前 ⋅ 回覆

Whing  

真是個悖論。唐納德·特朗普和這份戰略真的在同一頁上嗎？關於臺灣，美國和盟國真的守得住第一島鏈嗎？蘭德公司報告怎麼說？  

44分鐘前 ⋅ 回覆 ♡

新增 8 2 3

Digging Deeper into the 2025 US National Security Strategy... 99

I am repeatedly seeing takes depicting the latest US National Security Strategy as a "major shift," including Russia's RT- somehow "away" from conflict with Russia and even China, and toward the "Western Hemisphere."

They obviously did NOT read the entire 33 page document and are instead cherrypicking choice passages that tell them what they want to hear/believe.

Here are some other, less convenient quotes that make it obvious the US isn't going anywhere - it is simply expanding its network of proxies into what it itself calls a "burden sharing network" the US CONTROLS and SUPPORTS to avoid America's own overextension,

The latest strategy paper says:

"Continuing President Trump's approach of asking allies to assume primary responsibility for their regions, the United States will organize a burden-sharing network, with our government as convener and supporter.

This approach ensures that burdens are shared and that all such efforts benefit from broader legitimacy.

The model will be targeted partnerships that use economic tools to align incentives, share burdens with like-minded allies, and insist on reforms that anchor long-term stability. This strategic clarity will allow the United States to counter hostile and subversive influences efficiently while avoiding the overextension and diffuse focus that undermined past efforts."

Did you get that? This network allows the US to "counter hostile and subversive influences," which influences do you think they mean? Russia, China, Iran, etc. Obviously!

This is literally the evolution of what Secretary Pete Hegseth laid out in Brussels in February the "division of labor" he demanded from Europe and America's Asian proxies to, "establish a division of labor that maximizes our comparative advantages in Europe and Pacific respectively."

(Source: https://www.war.gov/News /Speeches

In regards to China specifically, the NSS says:

We will build a military capable of denying aggression anywhere in the First Island Chain. But the American military cannot, and should not have to, do this alone. Our allies must step up and spend- and more importantly do-much more for collective defense. America's diplomatic efforts should focus on pressing our First Island Chain allies and partners to allow the U.S, military greater access to their ports and other facilities, to spend more on their own defense, and most importantly to invest in capabilities aimed at deterring

aggression."

Unless the First Island Chain has somehow moved to the Western Hemisphere - what the paper is admitting is that the US will not only keep the TENS OF THOUSANDS of US troops it has in Asia there it will EXPAND their presence while forcing its proxies in the region to divert more public funds to pursuing the US containment of China.

The entire paper is full of such contradictions - claiming it stands of the primacy of the nation state while demanding entire regions of the planet work with whom the US says and in the manner the US decides,

The paper claims it wants to end the Ukraine conflict, while demanding Europe prepare to fight an unnamed "adversary from dominating Europe," (obviously Russia).

Nothing is changing. Nothing could change. The material reality of US power and its relationship with the rest of the world is driven by corporate-financier interests that direct Washington, not the empty rhetoric taking place in Washington itself.

If you read the paper carefully, and completely, you will see that even the paper admits this.

So please wake up! Stop cherrypicking and reading what you want to read -identify what is lip service, and what is clearly describing continuity of agenda - read what is actually in front of γου.

Read the WHOLE National Security Strategy paper HERE:

https://www.whitehouse.gov /wp-content.

From: The New Atlas (Brian Berletić)

#geopolitics

The Last Stand of the Sa...

1小時前查看翻譯

2則評論

Camer

羅馬帝國已經走到了最後 『,它的結局將比羅馬帝國向西方列強擴張還要糟糕第一則評論

14時回覆

Whing

真是個悖論。唐納德·特朗普和戰略在同一頁上?Wrt臺灣,美國和盟國可以保衛第一島鏈嗎?蘭德報告怎麼說? 44分鐘回覆 ♡

新增油 8 2 3