跳過導航唐納德·川普大肆宣傳的生日遊行卻是一場巨大的失敗。
唐納德·川普對於耗資數百萬美元的軍事閱兵並不感冒。
據傳記作家邁克爾沃爾夫稱，總統對國防部長皮特赫格塞斯以及參加此次活動的士兵進行了嚴厲批評，此次活動原本宣傳為慶祝陸軍成立 250 週年，但卻恰好落在川普的生日當天。
沃爾夫週一在接受《每日野獸》播客採訪時透露，川普「對士兵們感到憤怒」。據報道，川普希望這些士兵看起來“令人生畏”，但他們“玩得很開心”，沃爾夫說。
《火與怒》的作者在播客中說：“他指責他們誇大其詞，但他的意思似乎是，他們當時玩得很開心，他們揮手致意，他們很享受，表現出一種愉快的表情，而不是軍人的表情。”
「他為此狠狠地批評了赫格塞斯，」川普的傳記作者說。 “顯然，他打了個電話，然後對赫格塞斯說，’語氣完全不對。為什麼語氣不對？是誰策劃的？語氣有問題。’”
這場遊行預計耗資高達4500萬美元，並非像2月新聞稿中所述的那樣，最初是為了慶祝陸軍週年紀念日。與此同時，這場遊行——幾乎沒能填滿看台——很容易被一場反對川普議程的全國性「反國王日」抗議活動所掩蓋，一些組織者稱，這場抗議活動吸引了超過500萬人參加。
沃爾夫在談到這次盛大的陸軍週年紀念活動時說：“這並沒有傳達出他顯然想要的信息，那就是他是這個危險企業的總司令。”
白宮對沃爾夫關於慶祝活動的描述反應不佳，反而選擇公開誹謗沃爾夫是個騙子和「說謊的混蛋」。
白宮通訊主管張四平告訴《野獸》：“他經常根據自己病態扭曲的想像編造故事，這僅僅是因為他患有嚴重且使人衰弱的特朗普精神錯亂綜合症，這種綜合症已經腐蝕了他花生大小的大腦。”
川普也對美國士兵的行進模式感到不安，由於部隊的步伐不同步，這種模式在閱兵式後在網路上瘋傳。
夏洛特·克萊默 (Charlotte Clymer) 是美國陸軍退伍軍人，曾是被稱為“老衛隊”的美國第三步兵團成員，她告訴Buzzfeed ，她不相信“行軍質量差”是因為一些部隊不習慣行軍的謠言。
克萊默在接受數位出版物採訪時表示：「每個士兵都會在基礎訓練中學習如何行軍，這並不難，非常簡單。」他強調，部隊在訓練前幾天就已經進行了一次彩排。
「我不認為這是對川普的抗議，也不認為這是任何與反法西斯主義或對政府運作方式的擔憂相關的活動，」她繼續說道。 「我認為這與此無關。我認為這只是因為他們受到了非常惡劣的待遇，而他們卻毫不在意。我認為那些在閱兵式上失足的士兵——他們有很多——只是疲憊、惱火，甚至可能在某種程度上感到憤怒，他們根本不在乎以高標準進行遊行。”
這可能是因為住宿條件差、食物不好、叫醒服務粗糙，或者可能因為人們認為遊行「完全沒有必要」。
「每個人都知道，這場遊行是為了唐納德·川普——就連那些可能投票給他的士兵也知道，這是為了滿足他的虛榮心，」克萊默告訴Buzzfeed。 “我不知道你是怎麼想的，但我絕對不想為了讓某個人自我感覺良好而參加遊行。”
唐納德·川普承認其大規模驅逐行動對這些行業造成了多大的破壞後不到一周，美國國土安全部就撤銷了保護農場、酒店和餐館免受移民突襲的指導意見。
根據《華盛頓郵報》報道，國土安全部官員週一上午與全國 30 個 ICE 外地辦事處通話時，給出了恢復工作場所執法的新指導。
就在這項新指令發布的幾天前，川普公開承認，他的突襲行動正在搶走一些“非常優秀、長期的工人”，而且由於這些工人可能會被罪犯取代，“我們必須保護我們的農民”。
國土安全部的一名官員隨後指示特工「暫停所有針對農業（包括水產養殖和肉類加工廠）、餐廳和經營性酒店的現場執法調查/行動」。
但經濟政策似乎並不是川普可能改變的唯一領域，不到一週後，突襲行動還會恢復。
看來白宮——尤其是要求每天逮捕 3,000 名移民的白宮副幕僚長史蒂芬米勒——並不完全支持暫停工作場所執法。
Two people familiar with Miller’s anti-immigration efforts told the Post that he’d opposed the pause, and ICE and Homeland Security Investigations field office supervisors had heard that the policy would likely be reversed Sunday because the White House didn’t support it, according to one person with knowledge of the reversal.
In a statement Monday, DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said that there would be “no safe spaces for industries who harbor violent criminals or purposely try to undermine ICE’s efforts.”
Chaotic Trump Leaves Confused World Leaders Behind at G7
The president abruptly left the conference of world leaders—and it only became clear later what he was really up to (helping Israel bomb Iran).
President Trump made a dramatic early exit from the G7 summit, seemingly to help Israel continue to bombard Iran and its nuclear facilities.
“Iran should have signed the ‘deal’ I told them to sign. What a shame, and waste of human life. Simply stated, IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON,” he wrote on Truth Social. “I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!”
Trump has supported Israel in its attacks, explaining that he gave Iran “60 days” to make a so-called “deal,” meaning Iran has to stop working on nuclear power and weapons. French President Emmanuel Macron suggested Trump was leaving to try to craft a ceasefire. But Trump didn’t rush out of the G7 to make peace, he left to plan for war.
“I have not reached out to Iran for ‘Peace Talks’ in any way, shape, or form. This is just more HIGHLY FABRICATED, FAKE NEWS! If they want to talk, they know how to reach me,” he wrote again on Truth Social. “They should have taken the deal that was on the table—Would have saved a lot of lives!!!”
While the G7 leaders did sign a resolution pledging that Iran can never obtain nuclear weapons and publicly mentioned a ceasefire, Trump has further isolated the U.S. by seemingly declaring Israel’s war for them.
“Publicity seeking President Emmanuel Macron, of France, mistakenly said that I left the G7 Summit, in Canada, to go back to D.C. to work on a ‘cease fire’ between Israel and Iran. Wrong!” Trump wrote again. “He has no idea why I am now on my way to Washington, but it certainly has nothing to do with a Cease Fire. Much bigger than that. Whether purposely or not, Emmanuel always gets it wrong. Stay Tuned!”
His exit means he will miss meetings with Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
Joni Ernst’s Sick Response to Medicaid Cuts Has Tanked Her Career
When Joni Ernst quipped that “we all are going to die,” she probably wasn’t referring to her reelection prospects.
Will Iowa Senator Joni Enst call it quits after her humiliating defense of Donald Trump’s budget bill?
Several Republican aides, consultants, and strategists told The Wall Street Journal that there was widespread speculation Ernst would not seek another term in the Senate.
At a disastrous town hall in late May, Ernst was discussing the Trump-backed “one big beautiful bill,” which will kick an estimated 5.4 million people off of Medicaid. A constituent cried out, “People will die!”
“Well, we all are going to die,” Ernst shot back.
As it turns out, Iowans didn’t appreciate the Republican senator getting existential, and now the embattled senator has delayed her annual “Roast and Ride” fundraiser until October. Typically, Ernst—who has been in office since 2015—holds the event in June.
Ernst’s “political ascent within the GOP has stalled,” the Journal reported.
But for now, it’s all just speculation. Earlier this month, Ernst brought on Bryan Kraber to manage her 2026 reelection campaign, signaling her intent to turn her sinking ship around.
MAGA Desperately Scrambles to Claim Minnesota Assassin Is a Democrat
The far right is pushing a dangerous conspiracy theory about the man accused of assassinating a Minnesota state lawmaker.
Vance Boelter allegedly shot and killed Democratic Minnesota state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband Saturday. Hours later, conservatives were twisting Boelter’s political ideology to shield MAGA, claiming that the suspected cop/masked killer was a deranged leftist seeking violent retribution.
In reality, Boelter was a Trump supporter who voted for Donald Trump in November, his best friend David Carlson told reporters Saturday. Boelter was a longtime conservative who was a registered Republican when he and his wife lived in Oklahoma in the early 2000s. He was against abortion rights but “never mentioned any particular anger with the lawmakers who were shot,” Carlson told CNN.
None of that seemed to faze conservatives, however, who spent the aftermath of the attack skewing Boelter’s beliefs to frame the other side of the aisle.
Long after reports spilled out that Boelter was a conservative, Elon Musk took to X to claim that “the far left is murderously violent,” quote tweeting a self-described MAGA Trumper lumping Boelter into the left, which she said had become a “full blown domestic terrorist organization.”
Saturday night, far-right influencer Laura Loomer told her followers that the media was trying to “gaslight” Americans into believing that the “shooter in Minnesota is a Trump supporter.” Loomer also decried local organizers of the nationwide “No Kings” movement, and called for their detention alongside Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, Kamala Harris’s 2024 vice presidential pick.
Podcast host Alec Lace questioned if Hortman was “fearful” that “her base would become unhinged,” after she sided with Republicans as the lone Democratic-Farmer-Labor (DFL) party member to repeal state health care for undocumented immigrants.
“Was her vote the motive?” posited Lace.
The tune had still not changed by Sunday, when Fox News contributor Paul Mauro described Boelter’s political background as “murky” while advancing the conspiracy that Hortman had been assassinated for her vote, rejecting Carlson’s recollection of his friend by claiming that he had not offered enough details to qualify Boelter as a conservative.
“The political backdrop of this is, again, murky. Going to the roommate, yea, [Boelter] voted for Donald Trump, but he was not engaged in local politics,” Mauro said. “And I didn’t know anything — that he even knew these local politicians, he didn’t seem to be very engaged in all of that. He says the only thing that [Boelter] seemed to be engaged with politically was that he was anti-abortion. That seems to be the only solid thing that the roommate can point to.”
Mauro then claimed that Boelter had “associations” with Walz and had received money from the governor.
Boelter “stalked his victims like prey” and “shot them in cold blood,” acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Minnesota Joseph Thompson said during a press conference Monday, likening Boelter’s alleged crime to “the stuff of nightmares.” The 57-year-old reportedly approached the Hortman residence and the home of Minnesota Senator John Hoffman dressed as a cop in tactical gear and a hyper-realistic silicon mask.
Boelter also owned a police-styled SUV with a license plate that read “police.” The car “looked exactly like an SUV squad car,” equipped with emergency lights, according to Brooklyn Park Police Chief Mark Bruley. It was convincing enough that it fooled an officer who was dispatched to conduct a wellness check on a politician in the city of New Hope after Boelter allegedly attacked Hoffman and his wife. Upon seeing the vehicle near the lawmaker’s home, the officer pulled up alongside Boelter’s car, believing that he was another cop who had beaten them to the scene, before allowing Boelter to slip away, according to Thompson.
Customs Officials Deport Man for Reporting on Pro-Palestine Protests
Writer Alistair Kitchen says he was targeted for his coverage of the Columbia University protests.
U.S. Customs and Border Patrol officials reportedly told an Australian writer who was detained and deported upon his arrival in Los Angeles that he was being removed for writing about pro-Palestinian protests on his personal blog, according to The Guardian.
In a thread of posts on X Sunday, Alistair Kitchen said he had just landed back in Australia after 12 hours in detention and a 30-hour round trip. “They just came out and said it: ‘We both know why you’ve been detained … it’s because of what you wrote about the protests at Columbia,’” Kitchen recounted.
Kitchen, who lived in New York for six years before moving back to Australia in 2024, had written about the campus protests at Columbia University opposing Israel’s ongoing military campaign in Gaza for his Substack blog Kitchen Counter. Kitchen was a master’s student in creative writing at Columbia at the time.
In his thread, Kitchen said that officials were waiting for him when he got off the plane and seemed to already have a file containing information about him, despite a social media sweep he’d conducted ahead of his trip just to be safe. “If you are deleting social media ~48hrs before your flight to the US, *it is already too late,*” Kitchen warned in another post.
Kitchen told The Guardian that CBP officers claimed they’d found evidence of drug use on his phone, despite his responses to an ESTA form. Although he doubted that there was any actual evidence, he admitted to having lied. In his thread, Kitchen said that he regretted giving officers the password to his phone, and allowed himself to be barred from entering the United States.
Earlier this year, Customs and Border Patrol began to increase screenings of immigrants’ phones, computers, cameras, and other devices. In March, a French scientist was reportedly denied entry to the U.S. due to texts criticizing Donald Trump.
Kitchen wrote a blog in March about Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University graduate student and lead negotiator for the students’ protest encampment who was detained by ICE despite possessing a green card.
“The goal here is the deportation of dissent,” Kitchen wrote at the time.
“This is a mode of speech suppression that seeks to physically remove the undesirable elements it can, and, through fear, ensure silence in everyone else,” he added, referring to Trump‘s executive order targeting so-called “Hamas sympathizers” with student visas.
Last week, a judge ruled that Secretary of State Marco Rubio could not detain and deport Khalil on the flimsy basis that he threatened U.S. foreign policy interests—but the Trump administration is still intent on keeping Khalil behind bars.
Reagan Appointee: Trump NIH Cuts Represent “Racial Discrimination”
“Have we fallen so low? Have we no shame?” asked Judge William Young, in a ruling that reinstated funding to the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, among other programs.
A judge appointed by Ronald Reagan just ruled that President Trump’s cuts to DEI-related equity research grants at the National Institutes of Health were both discriminatory and illegal.
The Trump administration, led by DOGE, cut more than $1.81 billion in National Institutes of Health grants in less than 40 days. The National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities got the worst of it, with 30 percent of its grant funding being cut—twice the average. Grants focusing on Black women’s maternal health and HIV were also slashed. The cuts were made on the grounds that “so-called diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) studies are often used to support unlawful discrimination on the basis of race.”
Today Judge William Young, 84, declared those cuts “illegal” and “void.”
“I am hesitant to draw this conclusion, but I have an unflinching obligation to draw it–that this represents racial discrimination. And discrimination against America’s LGBTQ community. That’s what this is. I would be blind not to call it out. My duty is to call it out,” he wrote in his ruling. “It is palpably clear that these directives and the set of terminated grants here also are designed to frustrate, to stop, research that may bear on the health—we’re talking about health here, the health of Americans, of our LGBTQ community. That’s appalling.”
Young continued, clearly upset with the Trump administration’s action.
“I’ve never seen a record where racial discrimination was so palpable. I’ve sat on this bench now for 40 years. I’ve never seen government racial discrimination like this.... I ask myself, how can this be?” he said. “I have the protection that the Founders wrote into the Constitution, along with imposing upon me a duty to speak the truth in every case. I try to do that. What if I didn’t have those protections? What if my job was on the line, my profession? ... Would I have stood up against all this? Would I have said, ‘You can’t do this?’ You are bearing down on people of color because of their color. The Constitution will not permit that.
“Have we fallen so low? Have we no shame?”
Even with Young’s ruling’s spirited proclamation, there is no indication that Trump will actually follow it and reinstate the NIH grants.
Trump Wants to Ban a Quarter of the World From Traveling to the U.S.
If put into effect, it could jeopardize future events like the 2026 World Cup and 2028 Olympics.
The Trump administration is thinking about adding 26 more countries—most of them African—to his travel ban list.
The Washington Post obtained a Trump administration memo that would give the 26 countries listed 60 days to capitulate to State Department demands. Some countries were flagged for having “no competent or cooperative central government authority to produce reliable identity documents or other civil documents,” or “government fraud.” There was also a requirement against “antisemitic and anti-American activity in the United States” by people from the listed countries. Nearly all of the listed countries are in Africa, the Caribbean, or the Middle East.
The added countries are:
Angola, Antigua and Barbuda, Benin, Bhutan, Burkina Faso, Cabo Verde, Cambodia, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Dominica, Ethiopia, Egypt, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kyrgyzstan, Liberia, Malawi, Mauritania, Niger, Nigeria, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Saint Lucia, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, South Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, Tonga, Tuvalu, Uganda, Vanuatu, Zambia, and Zimbabwe.
Trump already banned travelers from Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen earlier in June.
This is a xenophobic blanket policy that singles out Arab and African countries. And one thing Trump doesn’t seem to care about is how the timing and targets of this ban will impact both the 2026 World Cup in New York, Atlanta, Boston, and more, and the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles. These events, often massive international draws, could very well turn into ICE outposts, discouraging people from attending entirely. And even if it doesn’t, the reputational hit alone could do further damage to America’s international goodwill.
Mark Carney Brutally Shuts Trump Down for Whining on Russia’s Behalf
Donald Trump kicked off the G7 meeting by shilling for Russia.
America’s leader decided to open the international G7 summit with a long complaint, seemingly in support of Russia.
Speaking before the global trade coalition, Donald Trump lamented that the group—which consists of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States—would not allow Russia to join its ranks.
“The G7 used to be the G8,” Trump said. “Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn’t want to have Russia in, and I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn’t have a war right now if you had Russia in,” he added, referring to the former Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau.
The seven other members of the then G8 suspended Russia’s membership in 2014 as punishment for Moscow’s annexation of Crimea. But Trump doesn’t seem to have as many qualms about Russia’s efforts to seize neighboring territories.
“And you wouldn’t have a war right now if Trump were president four years ago, but it didn’t work out that way,” he continued, referring to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. “But it used to be the G8, and now it’s, I guess, what’s that, nine years ago? Eight years ago? They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake even though I wasn’t in politics then. I was very loud about it.
“You spend so much time talking about Russia, and he’s no longer at the table, so it makes life more complicated, but you wouldn’t have had the war,” Trump added.
As Trump’s rant continued, the summit’s leadership stepped in to intervene.
“I’m going to exercise my role, if you will, as G7 chair,” Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said as reporters continued to shout questions at the U.S. president about the escalating Iran-Israel conflict.
The U.S. has played a weaker and weaker hand in its game against Russia since Trump’s inauguration. On the campaign trail, Trump pledged to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours of returning to power—but that hasn’t been the case.
Instead, Trump’s aggression toward Ukraine (which included scolding and mocking Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy in a livestreamed White House meeting) and his repeated concessions on Russia’s enduring violence have been interpreted by Kremlin propagandists as a massive win for Russian President Vladimir Putin, resulting in televised laughter on Russian programs at the downfall of American power.
In the months since he took office, Trump has claimed that Russia has come ready and willing to reach a peace deal, even though many of its demands—such as staking a Russian flag in Crimea—reverse long-standing U.S. policy.
Following a deadly airstrike on Kyiv last month, European leaders urged Western countries to enact sanctions on Moscow as a way to reel Putin back to the negotiating table. But Trump responded by wringing his hands, claiming that applying pressure on Russia would “hurt” a deal.
Just about everyone in the U.S.—including Trump’s own party—wants the White House to act. By late May, Senate Republicans resorted to begging Trump to take a stand against Russia while they mulled over the possibility of going over his head to enact the internationally recommended sanctions. Senate Majority Leader John Thune announced last week that the upper chamber would begin work on a sanctions bill sometime this month.
Those realities pushed Senator Mitch McConnell into a terse exchange with Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth last week, in which the high-ranking Republican questioned the Cabinet official regarding which side the White House actually wanted to win.
Unhinged Trump Order Lets VA Doctors Refuse to Treat Democratic Vets
Doctors can also refuse treatment to unmarried veterans.
Healthcare professionals at the Department of Veterans Affairs can now discriminate against Democrats, and it’s all thanks to Donald Trump’s anti-trans executive order.
While medical staff are still required to treat patients regardless of race, color, religion, or sex, new rules at the VA have explicitly removed protections based on political party affiliation, martial status, and national origin, The Guardian reported Monday.
Similarly, health care professionals can now be banned from working at the VA over their political affiliation, marital status, and union membership, according to documents obtained by The Guardian.
The new rule changes apply to professionals across disciplines, including doctors, certified nurse practitioners, psychologists, dentists, chiropractors, optometrists, podiatrists, licensed clinical social workers, and speech therapists.
VA press secretary Peter Kasperowicz did not deny the reporting Monday, and told The Guardian that the changes were just a “formality” made in order to comply with Trump’s executive order “defending women from gender ideology extremism and restoring biological truth to the federal government.”
VA Deputy Assistant Secretary of Public Affairs Macaulay Porter, however, denied The Guardian’s characterization of the new policy, saying, “Updates will have no impact whatsoever on who VA treats or who works at VA.” Porter said that the VA would continue to comply with federal law preventing discrimination against patients and employees.
Dr. Arthur Caplan, founding head of the division of medical ethics at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine, told The Guardian that the VA’s new rules were “extremely disturbing and unethical.”
“It seems on its face an effort to exert political control over the VA medical staff,” Caplan said. “What we typically tell people in healthcare is: ‘You keep your politics at home and take care of your patients.’”
“Those views aren’t relevant to caring for patients. So why would we put anyone at risk of losing care that way?” Caplan added.
Trump’s executive order attempting to redefine the government’s definitions of gender and sexuality has already upended essential medical care for transgender patients across the country, and opened the door for a sweeping crackdown on LGBTQ+ rights throughout the federal government.
The Trump administration has also taken part in a disturbing trend of targeting Democrats with violence and chaos. On Sunday, the president threatened to expand his inhumane immigration enforcement efforts to areas where voters support Democratic candidates. On Saturday, two democratic lawmakers in Minnesota and their families were targeted by an assassin.
These new rules are also spurred by a Republican leadership that has embraced the nuclear American family in its desperation to cling to some invented past, sought to punish divorced people, and undermine programs that help single parents.
This story has been updated.
沒有留言:
張貼留言
注意：只有此網誌的成員可以留言。