对于美国蓄意瓦解大英帝国并使其破产的说法,普通英国人怎么看?

Profile photo for Wes Frank
对于美国蓄意瓦解大英帝国并使其破产的说法,普通英国人怎么看?

我不认为他们会对此忧心忡忡。 人们普遍认为,在 20 世纪瓦解大英帝国的是民族主义和两次世界大战的代价。 美国大约从 1902 年起就开始反帝国主义,1945 年后拒绝支持大英帝国,但不管怎样,它还是要解体自己。


大西洋宪章》规定,结束殖民主义和帝国是西方盟国在第二次世界大战中的目标;丘吉尔首相在返回伦敦后不得不向内阁解释,罗斯福总统并非特指大英帝国。

日本坚持认为,是日本发动的大东亚战争瓦解了英国、法国、荷兰和美国在亚洲的殖民地。

罗斯福是特指大英帝国,泛指所有帝国。

因为美国不是帝国。

显然,要做到这一点,就必须对当地人口进行种族灭绝,并对定居者进行文化同化。

这在印度是不可能实现的。 但没有理由让澳大利亚或加拿大独立,除了因为它们距离遥远。

好吧,所以你需要征服种族灭绝和同化邻近地区,然后你就没有帝国了,尽管你有一个很大的国家。

别忘了,英国政府借了大笔钱,让少数特权阶层受益。
 · 
Following

I don’t expect they fret much about it. It is generally understood that what dismantled the British Empire in the 20th Century was nationalism and the expense of two world wars. The United States was anti-imperialist from about 1902 on, and declined to support the British Empire after 1945, but it was going to disassemble itself regardless.

The Atlantic Charter stated that ending colonialism and empires were to be the aims of the Western Allies in World War II; Prime Minister Churchill had to explain to his cabinet on returning to London that President Roosevelt did not specifically mean the British Empire

Profile photo for Songkhla
Add a comment...
Profile photo for Songkhla

Japan insisted that it was Japan's initiation of the Great East Asian War which broke up the colonies of Britain, France, the Netherlands and the United States in Asia.

Profile photo for S Kam
 · 7m

FDR meant the British Empire specifically and all empires generally.

Profile photo for Dejan Čavić

Because USA is not an empire.

Apparently you achieve that by genocide of native population and cultural assimilation of settlers.

That was impossible to do in India. But there was no reason to give independence to Australia or Canada, except because they are far away.

Ok so you need to conquer genocide and assimilate neighbouring areas and then you don't have an empire although you have a large country.

Profile photo for Walt Miller

Don't forget that the British government borrowed huge sums of money that would benefit a few privileged people.


What does the average Brit think about the claim that USA purposely dismantled and bankrupted the British empire?
I don’t expect they fret much about it. It is generally understood that what dismantled the British Empire in the 20th Century was nationalism and the expense of two world wars. The United States was anti-imperialist from about 1902 on, and declined to support the British Empire after 1945, but it was going to disassemble itself regardless.


The Atlantic Charter stated that ending colonialism and empires were to be the aims of the Western Allies in World War II; Prime Minister Churchill had to explain to his cabinet on returning to London that President Roosevelt did not specifically mean the British Empire

Japan insisted that it was Japan's initiation of the Great East Asian War which broke up the colonies of Britain, France, the Netherlands and the United States in Asia.

FDR meant the British Empire specifically and all empires generally.

Because USA is not an empire.

Apparently you achieve that by genocide of native population and cultural assimilation of settlers.

That was impossible to do in India. But there was no reason to give independence to Australia or Canada, except because they are far away.

Ok so you need to conquer genocide and assimilate neighbouring areas and then you don't have an empire although you have a large country.

Don't forget that the British government borrowed huge sums of money that would benefit a few privileged people.

沒有留言:

張貼留言

注意:只有此網誌的成員可以留言。

選擇汪精衛中華帝國會像奧匈帝國鄂圖曼土耳其帝國一樣戰敗解體

選擇汪精衛 中華帝國會像奧匈帝國鄂圖曼土耳其帝國一樣戰敗解體 因為站錯了隊伍 北洋軍閥頭腦比汪精衛清楚 所以一戰才能拿回山東 孫文拿德國錢,他是反對參加一戰 選擇蔣介石, 中國將淪為共產主義國家 因為蔣介石鬥不過史達林 蔣介石即使打贏毛澤東 中國一樣會解體 中國是靠偽裝民族主義的...