牛仔文化雖然主要與美國傳統相關，但在世界各地以多種形式表現出來。在南美洲，來自阿根廷等國家的高喬人體現了獨立和馬術實力的相似特徵。墨西哥展示了查羅斯的迭代，查羅斯在墨西哥社會被尊為傳統騎手。同樣，俄羅斯的哥薩克人和澳洲的布須曼人也體現了牛仔精神，各自都有獨特的習俗，彰顯勇敢和土地親和力。好萊塢透過電影製作在全球傳播美國牛仔文化，將其描繪成獨立和冒險的象徵。這些電影成為在全球投射美國理想、塑造國際觀念和增強國家文化影響力的管道。
新增評論...
您的 .NET 專案需要影像處理解決方案嗎？
更多來自日本未經審查
已固定
GeoPolitical Economy & Multipolarity · July 7, 2022
The Russian news channel RIA is publishing not very well known documents about Ukraine. This one is pretty creepy. Ukrainian fascists had run away to Japanese Occupied Manchuria and there was even "Ukrainian colony" there.
As follows from the first published documents, in the 1930s, nationalists who fled from Ukraine carried out subversive activities against Soviet power in Japanese-occupied Manchuria and with the support of Nazi Germany. For propaganda purposes, the "Ukrainian National Colony" created in Manchuria - an organization whose main task was to actively fight against the USSR - published the journal "Far East".
https://ukraineuncensored.quora.com/The-Russian-news-channel-RIA-is-publishing-not-very-well-known-documents-about-Ukraine-This-one-is-pretty-creepy-Ukrai?ch=10&oid=74213146&share=a2a73a02&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
這次行動使用了400萬中國人作為強迫勞工，其中40%以上死於滿洲工業化
如果你是安倍晉三，你聽說過你祖父所做的所有恐怖事…你的第一直覺會是「我不想成為那樣的人」。他也因此結下了法西斯主義的心！
安倍的保守主義根源於童年，根深蒂固
週三再次就任首相的 58 歲安倍晉三在海外，尤其是在亞洲，被視為東京最知名、也可能是最臭名昭著的鷹派政客之一。
https://t.co/fJe6xTGpWo
摘自《邁阿密先驅報》，2006 年 9 月 19 日。
安倍讚揚他的祖父岸信介，他在日本帝國中發揮了領導作用，「無論有多少人反對，他都堅持前進，因為他是唯一的道路」。
https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-japans-shinzo-abe-unfinished-family-business-1418354470這沒東西看
二戰結束時，岸信介被當作甲級戰犯嫌疑犯入獄，但美國政府從未對他提出指控。相反，他成為了日本首相。
二戰英雄與日本過去的清算
小野田廣郎發誓永不投降。他相信他的其他同胞也會這樣做。
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-53763059
美國傳統：法西斯復興
胡志明將軍 · 十月 30, 2021
只是為了展示中情局如何有效地利用岸信介以 Gladio 風格重建日本政治體系：
40 年前，日本人被榎本美惠子的證詞所吸引，她的前夫、前首相田中角榮的政治秘書透過丸紅高層從洛克希德公司收受賄賂。這讓田中的防守出現了漏洞。 #KakueiTanaka 洛克希德公司賄賂日本首相的中間人是臭名昭著的戰犯和右翼黑幫小玉吉夫。洛克希德公司在東京的代表為中央情報局工作。中央情報局/洛克希德現金的推銷員是一位來自澳門的葡萄牙牧師，他從香港（中央情報局前線）迪克-佩雷拉貨幣兌換處提取了中央情報局現金，將現金藏在他乘坐飛往東京的航班上攜帶的橘子籃中，交給了他。二戰甲級戰犯兒玉芳雄，日本法西斯/黑幫頭目，中央情報局派他負責控制日本執政的自民黨近三十年，直到在洛克希德賄賂醜聞中曝光。塑造日本戰後政治格局的最終權力是岸信介，他被艾倫·杜勒斯從東京審判中拯救出來。 「格拉迪奧」模式（保留法西斯國家的骨架，有效消滅共產主義）出現在日本、德國和義大利。義大利是最突出的，也是最血腥的。格拉迪奧有很多教訓可以教我們如何進行地緣政治情報工作，以及媒體奇觀如何發揮作用，以及緊張局勢和假旗左翼恐怖事件的策略。這就是說，賄賂和腐敗在這些州是有限的出沒地，只是裝飾。國家本身的結構因其真實目的而受到損害。西爾維奧貝盧斯科尼是地下法西斯組織 P2 的成員，該組織是 Gladio 的一部分。
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/Just-to-demonstrate-how-efficiently-the-CIA-rebuilt-the-Japan-political-system-in-the-Gladio-style-using-Nobusuke-Kis?ch= 10&oid=53089294&share=cf3c92d8&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
Gen Ho Chi Minh · August 19, 2021
How Amerikkka turned Japan into its colony:
C.I.A. Spent Millions to Support Japanese Right in 50's and 60's "In a major covert operation of the cold war, the CIA spent millions of dollars to support the conservative party that dominated Japan's politics for a generation." C.I.A. Spent Millions to Support Japanese Right in 50's and 60's (Published 1994) The LDP has been in power for over 70 years since the end of the war with a tiny interruption of 1 year in 2012 when the opposition won, but quickly resigned due to the relentless media smear. Japan is essentially a one-party State. Fantastic return on investment for the US, not only did Kishi illegally force through the Anpo treaty, but Nakasone pledged Japan to the US as their “unsinkable aircraft carrier,” Koizumi sang “love me tender” with GW Bush, and Abe sang “ain’t no mountain high enough” to Obama. I’d definitely recommend Legacy of Ashes for anyone who wants to learn more about this and other truly insane pieces of CIA history
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/How-Amerikkka-turned-Japan-into-its-colony?ch=10&oid=16635477&share=1ad42923&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
Gen Ho Chi Minh · July 8, 2022
The Economist's on Japan LDP's uninterrupted rule
How the LDP dominates Japan’s politics
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/The-Economists-on-Japan-LDPs-uninterrupted-rule?ch=10&oid=74402225&share=14f63c80&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
Gen Ho Chi Minh · July 8, 2022
The Japanese political system would not be the dictatorship of fascists it is today without the CIA
CIA Reportedly Paid Millions to Japan's LDP
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/The-Japanese-political-system-would-not-be-the-dictatorship-of-fascists-it-is-today-without-the-CIA?ch=10&oid=74403052&share=ff5919b3&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
Gen Ho Chi Minh · July 8, 2022
In 1965, the US Ambassador to Japan Edwin O. Reischauer proposed covertly funding the Okinawan Liberal Democratic Party through mainland channels to maintain the enormous American military presence
American authorities reluctantly permitted executive elections in 1968, and the CIA through the Tokyo LDP headquarters and with assistance from a formerly imprisoned war criminal spent $1.6 million unsuccessfully attempting to influence the outcome Okinawa at one point hosted 1,200 American nuclear warheads. Connect this to Westmoreland's proposal for Operation Fracture Jaw, nuclear strikes against North Vietnamese forces - plans were drawn up in, and the bombs would have probably come from, Okinawa The American military bases also held 12,500 metric tons of mustard gas, phosgene, Agent Orange, and sarin, which were removed only after two years of violent uprisings. Birth defects caused by the use of Agent Orange continue to this day American soldiers engage in serious crimes at rates significantly higher than the local population, which official sources and military leadership continually downplay. Between 2015 and 2020, 69 Marines were convicted for sexual offenses involving minors Is it any surprise, then, that the overwhelming majority of Okinawans want the Americans gone?
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/In-1965-the-US-Ambassador-to-Japan-Edwin-O-Reischauer-proposed-covertly-funding-the-Okinawan-Liberal-Democratic-Party?ch=10&oid=74403530&share=b91d1e34&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
當傀儡國家「為了自己的利益」而變得過於傲慢時
維基解密公佈的文件顯示，美國國家安全局對日本企業集團、政府官員、各部會和高級顧問進行間諜活動，這種情況至少可以追溯到安倍晉三第一屆政府時期
維基解密 - 目標東京
(2015-07-31) 目標東京新聞稿今天，2015 年7 月31 日星期五，中歐夏令時間上午9 點，維基解密公佈“目標東京”，包括日本內閣和三菱等日本公司在內的35 個日本國家安全局絕密目標以及攔截訊息涉及美日關係、貿易談判和敏感的氣候變遷策略。該清單表明，美國國家安全局對日本企業集團、政府官員、各部會和高級顧問的間諜活動至少可以追溯到首相安倍晉三的第一屆政府，即從2006 年9 月持續到2007 年9 月。電話攔截目標清單包括總機日本內閣府；內閣官房長官菅義偉的執行秘書；被描述為“政府貴賓專線”的線路；日本中央銀行的多名官員，包括行長黑田東彥；至少一名中央銀行官員的家庭電話號碼；日本財務省內的眾多人員；日本經濟產業大臣宮澤洋一；三菱天然氣部門；以及三井石油部。今天的出版物還包含美國國家安全局截獲的日本政府高級官員的報告。其中四份報告被列為絕密。其中一份報告標有“REL TO USA, AUS, CAN, GBR, NZL”，這意味著它已被正式授權發布給美國的“五眼”情報夥伴：澳大利亞、加拿大、英國和紐西蘭。這些報告顯示了美國對日本政府監視的深度，顯示情報是從日本眾多政府部門和辦公室收集和處理的。這些文件顯示了對日本內部對以下問題審議的深入了解：農產品進口和貿易爭端；在世界貿易組織多哈回合談判中的立場；日本的技術發展計畫、氣候變遷政策、核能與能源政策、碳排放計畫；與國際能源總署 (IEA) 等國際機構的通訊；有關管理與美國和歐盟外交關係的戰略規劃和談話要點備忘錄草案；以及在安倍晉三官邸舉行的首相機密簡報會的內容。維基解密主編朱利安·阿桑奇表示：「在這些文件中，我們看到日本政府私下擔心要告訴美國多少或多少，以防止其氣候變遷提案或其外交關係受到損害。然而我們現在知道，美國聽到了一切，閱讀了一切，並將日本領導層的審議結果傳遞給澳洲、加拿大、紐西蘭和英國。不要指望全球監控超級大國會以榮譽或尊重的方式行事。只有在
https://wikileaks.org/nsa-japan/
「讓世界變得更美好」的木偶
Japan Uncensored · September 9, 2022
These are extremely rare and comprise 1500+ pages of data from Japan's WWII-era lethal biowarfare experiments on humans, translated by the US for its own BW program after it hired the key figures.
Anthrax The Report of "A" : US Army Chemical Corps : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Glanders The Report of "G" : US Army Chemical Corps : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive Plague The Report of "Q" : US Army Chemical Corps : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive
https://japanuncensored.quora.com/These-are-extremely-rare-and-comprise-1500-pages-of-data-from-Japans-WWII-era-lethal-biowarfare-experiments-on-humans?ch=10&oid=81095744&share=8c1e0d39&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
日本 731 部隊研究的疾病的完整清單，如 2047 年 12 月 12 日德特里克營基礎科學主任埃德溫·希爾發送給化學軍團長韋特將軍的報告中列出的。
當然，德特里克的科學家很高興能得到他們自己的研究人員對在人類身上進行的研究結果「有所顧忌」。所以他們只是使用了日本研究人員的這些數據，並保護後者免受起訴，使他們的工作成為“絕密”
Japan Uncensored · April 13, 2023
Memory Hole Thread🧵From 1983 UK Observer scoop - "Experiments on human guinea pigs by members of the Japanese germ warfare unit continued in Japan after the war with the help of secret funding from the American Government"
"The ostensible purpose of the work was to develop vaccines to fight disease... The money for the experiments came from the American 406th Division, part of the occupation forces... A number of Japanese doctors associated with Unit 731 were signed up as advisers...." "To test treatments for scrub typhus, the team instructed researchers to infect patients in a mental hospital in Niigata." Between 1953-1956, 118 patients were infected. Nine died, "another committed suicide rather than continue as a human guinea pig." "An investigation by the Tokyo Justice Ministry concluded that no permission from relatives had been obtained for the experiments, and there was no question of the tests being a form of treatment to 'cure' the patients, as the hospital claimed." Unit 731 scientists continued to inhabit high positions in Japan's medical and scientific establishment. Hisato Yoshimura, who in WW2 conducted deadly frostbite experiments on 'maruta' [human logs], later became 1st president of Japan's Meteorological Society. In a coming article will highlight how a U.S. Rear Admiral lied about origin of "scrub typhus," a disease studied by Unit 731, and later by U.S. Army 406th researchers, with help of ex-731 "advisers." The disease later surfaced in Korea, possibly as part of US germ war there. Of course you will hear very little if anything about this scandal in the histories of medical or military ethics. At the time, in the U.S., there was almost no mention of Unit 731, and the U.S. didn't own up to its postwar collaboration with same until the mid-1990s. Finally, I want to give credit to British researchers, Peter Williams and David Wallace. Their 1989 book, "Unit 731: The Japanese Army's Secret of Secrets," referenced the Observer article. The US printing of the book deleted the chapter the reference was in, so make sure you use the British edition by Hodder & Stoughton if you want to follow up this reference. Postwar Japan: "US Backed Japan's Germ Tests on Mentally Sick"
https://japanuncensored.quora.com/Memory-Hole-Thread-From-1983-UK-Observer-scoop-Experiments-on-human-guinea-pigs-by-members-of-the-Japanese-germ-warfa?ch=10&oid=107218181&share=502f61d4&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
蘇聯是唯一一個試圖起訴日本與731部隊有關的戰爭罪行的國家。
美國掩蓋真相，特赦發現的人員，還說731部隊是共產黨的宣傳
西方將哈巴羅夫斯克審判斥為「共產主義宣傳」：意識形態、證據和國際生物倫理學 - PubMed
1949年底，前蘇聯在西伯利亞東部城市哈巴羅夫斯克對八名日本醫生和研究人員以及其他四名軍人進行了公開審判。儘管其意識形態色彩濃厚，並存在缺乏國際參與等諸多明顯缺陷，但…
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16025597/
備忘錄稱美國隱瞞了日本的戰爭罪行
「如果你在一次實驗中倖存下來，他們就會再次利用你；沒有人逃脫死亡。
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1988-12-18-me-1014-story.html
GeoPolitical Economy & Multipolarity · April 15, 2022
Reminder: USSR tried Japanese war criminals who admitted experiments on U.S. POWs in order to build an ethnically-targeted bioweapon.
U.S. denied Japan did this, tho secretly knew they did. Truth didn't come out in U.S. until 2010, but was ignored. Soviet charges of Japan BW experiments of U.S. POWs & U.S. Denials Why? A full list of diseases studied by Japan's Unit 731, as listed in the 12/12/47 report by Chief of Basic Sciences at Camp Detrick, Edwin Hill, as sent to Gen. Waitt, Chief of Chemical Corps May 1947, US use human experimentation to study “direct effect of BW agents on man” How the US Chemical Corps, assigned the responsibility of implementing the Joint Chiefs of Staff “crash program” in bioweaponry for the Korean War, turned to “stop-gap measures” to achieve BW “operational readiness”, w/help from Unit 731 History repeats Ukraine War Reveals Possible U.S. Preparations for Biological Warfare - CovertAction Magazine
https://ukraineuncensored.quora.com/Reminder-USSR-tried-Japanese-war-criminals-who-admitted-experiments-on-U-S-POWs-in-order-to-build-an-ethnically-target?ch=10&oid=66379595&share=0e0561dc&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
GeoPolitical Economy & Multipolarity · March 26, 2022
20% of the pathogens destroyed at the Kharkiv, Ukraine biolab were the same species as those researched and/or used by Japan's notorious Unit 731. Some were also researched by Ft. Detrick.
The Destroyed Ukraine Bioagents: Dangerous or Benign?
https://ukraineuncensored.quora.com/20-of-the-pathogens-destroyed-at-the-Kharkiv-Ukraine-biolab-were-the-same-species-as-those-researched-and-or-used-by-J?ch=10&oid=64676411&share=5ba290a2&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
GeoPolitical Economy & Multipolarity · June 6, 2022
The secret Ukrainian military programs
by Thierry Meyssan (On March 4, 2022, during an attack by Ukrainian special forces on the Zaporizhia nuclear power plant, which the Russian army had been occupying for several days, a projectile set off a fire in an adjacent laboratory. At that moment, the world, unaware of what was at stake in the battle, believed that the fighters had gone mad and were taking the reckless risk of blowing up the plant) In 2016, the United States committed to arming Ukraine to fight and win a war against Russia. Subsequently, the US Department of Defense organized a biological research program in Ukraine, and then huge amounts of nuclear fuel were secretly transferred to the country. These data change the interpretation of this war: it was not wanted and prepared by Moscow, but by Washington. Throughout this series of articles, which began a month and a half before the war in Ukraine, I have been developing the idea that the Straussians, the small group of Leo Strauss followers in the US administration, were planning a confrontation against Russia and China. However, in the tenth episode of this series, I related how the Azov regiment became the paramilitary pillar of the Ukrainian Banderists by referring to the visit of Senator John McCain to it in 2016 [1]. However, the latter is not a Straussian, but was advised by Robert Kagan during his presidential election campaign in 2008, a central thinker among the Straussians [2], even though he has always cautiously denied his membership in this sect. THE PLANNING OF THE WAR AGAINST RUSSIA A video, filmed during John McCain’s visit to Ukraine in 2016, has resurfaced. It shows the senator accompanied by his colleague and friend, Senator Lindsey Graham, and Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko. The two Americans are traveling on a Senate mission. But McCain is also the president of the IRI (International Republican Institute), the Republican branch of the NED (National Endowment for Democracy). It is known that the IRI has conducted about 100 seminars for the leaders of Ukrainian political parties classified as right-wing, including for the Banderists. The senators are addressing officers of the Azov regiment, the main Banderist paramilitary formation. This should come as no surprise. John McCain has always maintained that the United States should rely on the enemies of its enemies, whoever they may be. Thus, he has publicly claimed responsibility for his contacts with Daesh against the Syrian Arab Republic [3] In this video, Senators Lindsey Graham and John McCain assure that the United States will give all the weapons necessary for them to succeed in defeating Russia. This video, I repeat, was recorded six years before the Russian army entered Ukraine. The two senators are investing their interlocutors with a mission. They do not see them as mercenaries who are paid, but as proxies who will fight for the unipolar world to the death. (President Petro Poroshenko hands over his new badge to the SBU.) Shortly afterwards, President Poroshenko, who had attended the meeting in battle dress, changed the badge of his secret service, the SBU. It is now an owl holding a sword directed against Russia with the motto "The wise will rule over the stars". It is clear that the Ukrainian state apparatus was preparing for war against Russia on behalf of the United States. Three years later, on September 5, 2019, the Rand Corporation organized a meeting in the US House of Representatives to explain its plan: to weaken Russia by forcing it to deploy in Kazakhstan, then in Ukraine and as far as Transnistria [4]. I have explained at length in two previous articles [5] that at the end of the Second World War the United States and the United Kingdom took over many Nazi leaders and Ukrainian Banderists to turn them against the USSR. They mothered these fanatics as soon as the USSR disappeared and used them against Russia. It remained to explore how they armed them. THE UKRAINIAN MILITARY BIOLOGICAL PROGRAM Starting in 2014, the Ukrainian state began several secret military programs. The first and most well known is its collaboration with the Pentagon in 30 different laboratories. According to the United States, this program was aimed at destroying the biological weapons that the Soviet Union had manufactured and stored in Ukraine. This is obviously unlikely because it is not clear, 31 years after independence and 8 years after the start of this program, why there would still be any left. On the contrary, according to Russia, the Pentagon had Ukraine subcontract research on weapons prohibited by the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention. On the basis of documents seized during its special operation, it asserts in particular that experiments were carried out without their knowledge on mentally ill people at the psychiatric hospital No. 1 (Streletchyé, Kharkov region) and that a tuberculosis agent was manipulated to infect the population of the Slavianoserbsk district (Lugansk People’s Republic). Or that these laboratories were conducting "extremely dangerous experiments aimed at strengthening the pathogenic properties of plague, anthrax, tularemia, cholera and other deadly diseases by using synthetic biology. Another project involves bats as vectors for the transmission of potential biological warfare agents, such as plague, leptospirosis, brucellosis, filoviruses or coronaviruses. These serious accusations are still not clearly refuted or established. The meeting that Russia convened on this subject at the United Nations Security Council on March 11, 2022 [6] did not produce anything. After denying it, Under Secretary of State Victoria Nuland (and wife of Robert Kagan) said at a US Senate hearing on March 8, 2022: "Ukraine has ... biological research facilities. We are concerned that Russian troops are trying to take control of them. So we are trying, with the Ukrainians, to make sure that these research materials do not fall into the hands of Russian forces if they get close." Despite these inconsistencies, the West has rallied behind Washington, accusing Moscow of lying. In their eyes, it is perfectly normal for states to have collections of these diseases in order to study them, their presence should not be interpreted as intended for the manufacture of weapons. Ukrainian laboratories are regularly monitored by the OSCE (Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe) [7]. Nevertheless, this interpretation does not allow us to understand Ms. Nuland’s words and does not account for disasters such as, for example, the swine flu epidemic that killed 20 Ukrainian soldiers in January 2016 and forced 200 others to be hospitalized. The Russian ambassador, Vasily Nebenzia, in particular denounced research on the transmission of dangerous diseases by ectoparasites such as lice and fleas. He recalled that similar experiments had "been conducted in the 1940s by the infamous Unit 731 of the Japanese army, whose members fled to the United States to escape justice. Unit 731 is the Japanese equivalent of Dr. Josef Mengele’s department at Auschwitz. As if that were not enough, Mr. Nebenzia asked about the transfer of several thousand blood serum samples of patients of Slavic origin from the Ukraine to the Walter Reed Research Institute of the US Army. Research, according to him, selectively targeting specific ethnic groups like the ones Dr. Wouter Basson conducted for apartheid South Africa and Israel during its colonial period against blacks and Arabs ("Coast Project"). The UN administration denied any knowledge of the program and referred to the confidence-building measures in the treaty. The World Health Organization (WHO) said it was aware of the program but did not know the details. It confirmed in writing to Reuters that it had "strongly recommended to the Ukrainian Ministry of Health and other responsible agencies to destroy high-risk pathogens to prevent any potential leakage" [8]. The Chinese press, meanwhile, reports on experiments to turn insects into cyborgs in order to fertilize or sterilize crops (Operation Insects Allies). (Meeting of experts from the Ministries of Defense and Health of the United States, Poland and Ukraine, organized by the company of Hunter Biden and Christopher Heinz in 1996.) Source: Science and Technology Center in Ukraine These military experiments, whatever they were, were indirectly commissioned by the National Medical Intelligence Center through the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) and the US company Rosemont Seneca Technology Partners (RSTP). The latter was founded by Hunter Biden and Christopher Heinz, respectively son of President Joe Biden and son-in-law of John Kerry [9]. All the results of this research have been sent to the military biological laboratories at Fort Detrick, which once played a leading role in the US biological weapons program. As the Chinese representative to the Security Council pointed out, "Any information or leads on military biological activities should be given great attention by the international community... The United States says it is for transparency. If the United States believes that the information is false, it should provide the relevant data and clarification so that the international community can make a decision on the matter. According to the United Nations, while the United States has provided regular reports on its biological activities under the Biological Weapons Convention, Ukraine has never submitted any [10]. Russia has taken several steps. First, it carefully destroyed the containers of 26 of these Ukrainian laboratories (4 others escaped the Russian army). Second, it invited its CSTO (Collective Security Treaty Organization) allies to monitor any agreements they might have made with the United States. Armenia and Kazakhstan stopped this research. Finally, CSTO members have banned all foreign defense personnel from their laboratories. (The director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, Rafael Grossi, revealed at the Davos Forum that Ukraine has huge quantities of plutonium and enriched uranium) UKRAINE’S MILITARY NUCLEAR PROGRAM Let’s come to the most problematic part of the story, because it is even more serious. Upon independence, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine inherited much of the Soviet nuclear weapons system. These three new states signed the Budapest Memorandum in 1994 with the United States, Russia and the United Kingdom. The Big Three pledged to secure their borders, while the small three pledged to transfer all their nuclear weapons to Russia and to abide by the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. This memorandum is often referred to by those who want to emphasize the duplicity of Russia, which, after signing it, violated it. This is not true, since the memorandum provides that each of the Big Three will be relieved of its promise of non-intervention in case of "self-defence or in any other manner consistent with the provisions of the United Nations Charter". Yet, Russia officially recognized the Donbass republics after the Ukrainian state refused to honour its signature of the Minsk Agreements and its army shelled the Donbass for 8 years. Between 2014 and 2022, Ukraine asked four times for a renegotiation of the Budapest Memorandum. Finally, President Volodymyr Zelensky said at the annual meeting of the Munich Security Conference on February 19, 2022: "I, as president, will do it for the first time. But Ukraine and I are doing it for the last time. I am launching consultations within the framework of the Budapest Memorandum. The Minister of Foreign Affairs has been asked to convene them. If they do not happen again or if their results do not guarantee the security of our country, Ukraine will have the right to think that the Budapest Memorandum is not working and that all the comprehensive decisions of 1994 are being questioned" [11]. Questioning "all the global decisions of 1994" cannot mean anything other than taking back nuclear weapons. Therefore, President Zelensky’s position can be summarized as follows: let us suppress the Donbass separatists or we will restore our military nuclear program. It should be noted that the main leaders of the Atlantic Alliance were present or represented in the room. Yet none of them protested the announcement of a violation of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons. Commenting on the speech, Russian President Vladimir Putin said, "The only thing [Ukraine] lacks is a uranium enrichment system. But this is a technical issue, and for Ukraine it is not an insoluble problem.” Russian intelligence services were informed that Ukraine had a nuclear military program. We don’t know how much they knew about that program. (Laurence Norman, the Wall Street Journal’s special envoy to the Davos forum on Iran’s nuclear program, reported Rafael Grossi’s statement on Ukraine’s nuclear program on Twitter, but did not publish an article about it. The information was confirmed by another journalist, this time from the New York Times, also on Twitter) Rafael Grossi of Argentina, who heads the International Atomic Energy Agency, incidentally said at the Davos Forum on May 25 that Ukraine had stored 30 tons of plutonium and 40 tons of enriched uranium at its Zaporizhia plant and that his agency was wondering what had happened to them. Moreover, the Zaporizhia plant was one of the targets of the Russian army, which took it over on the second day of its special operation, February 26. A fire was set in an adjacent laboratory during a Russian-Ukrainian clash on March 4. At the time, the irresponsibility of the Russian army was denounced. Obviously, it was something else, as Moscow stated. Russia had started to transfer the fuel and Ukrainian special forces tried to stop them. Plutonium is sold for $5,000 to $11,000 per gram. 30 tons purchased at cost is worth $150 billion. The price of uranium depends on its degree of enrichment. At less than 5%, it can only be used for civilian purposes and must reach at least 80% for military use. Without knowing the degree of enrichment, the price cannot be evaluated. The seizure by Russia of this undeclared stockpile probably repays all the sanctions imposed on them. The information we have raises several questions: since when has Ukraine, which had given up all its Soviet-era stocks to Russia, been holding these materials? Where did they come from and who paid for them? Alternatively, what is the enrichment level of the uranium and who enriched it? To these questions, the Russian press adds another: how reliable is the International Atomic Energy Agency, which kept this information secret until last week? In view of these elements, it is appropriate to revise the common accusation according to which Russia is responsible for this war. The secret Ukrainian military programs, by Thierry Meyssan
https://ukraineuncensored.quora.com/The-secret-Ukrainian-military-programs?ch=10&oid=71086325&share=b7decb57&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
2007 年安倍晉三送給喬治·W·布希的禮物：他們的祖父（岸信介，日本首相和戰犯；普雷斯科特·布什，美國參議員和納粹德國的商業夥伴）1957 年與德懷特·艾森豪威爾打高爾夫球的照片
布希家族資助阿道夫·希特勒和納粹黨嗎？
華爾街玩家是否為臭名昭著的納粹分子提供了經濟資源？ ——如何在1930 年代將自己轉變為德國元首和 20 世紀 40 年代？納粹現象並非歷史巧合，更不是哲學…
https://www.veteranstodayarchives.com/2007/07/02/did-the-bush-family-fund-adolf-hitler-and-the-nazi-party/
布希的祖父如何幫助希特勒上台
世界新聞 布希的祖父如何幫助希特勒上台 關於美國第一家庭與納粹戰爭機器之間存在聯繫的謠言已經流傳了數十年。現在，《衛報》可以透露，今天的總統仍然感受到了根據《與敵人交易法》採取行動的事件的影響。已故美國參議員普雷斯科特·布希曾是一家公司的董事和股東。 《衛報》從美國國家檔案館新發現的文件中得到證實，普雷斯科特·布希擔任董事的一家公司與納粹主義的金融設計師有牽連。他的商業往來一直持續到他的公司資產於 1942 年根據《與敵人交易法》被沒收為止，60 多年後，奧斯維辛集中營的兩名前奴隸勞工在德國對布希家族提起民事損害賠償訴訟以及選舉前的激烈爭論。這些證據也促使一名前美國納粹戰爭罪檢察官辯稱，已故參議員的行為應該成為起訴向敵人提供援助和安慰的理由。關於普雷斯科特布希行為的爭論已經在表面上醞釀了一段時間。網路上一直有關於「布希/納粹」聯繫的討論，其中大部分是不準確和不公平的。但新文件（其中許多去年才解密）顯示，即使在美國參戰之後，當已經掌握了有關納粹計劃和政策的重要信息時，他仍然為與納粹有密切關係的公司工作並從中獲利。上台提供資金的德國企業。也有人認為，他從這些交易中賺到的錢有助於建立布希家族的財富並建立其政治王朝。值得注意的是，布希與德國的交易很少受到公眾監督，部分原因是涉及他的文件處於保密狀態。但現在，兩名大屠殺倖存者對布希家族提起了數十億美元的損害賠償訴訟，以及即將出版的三本有關該主題的書，有可能使普雷斯科特·布希的商業史成為他的孫子喬治·W 的一個令人不安的問題，因為他正在尋求恢復。雖然沒有跡象表明普雷斯科特·布希同情納粹事業，但文件顯示，他工作的布朗兄弟哈里曼公司(BBH) 是德國實業家弗里茨·蒂森在美國的基地，蒂森在1997 年為希特勒提供了資金。 《衛報》看到的證據表明，布希是總部位於紐約的聯合銀行公司（UBC）的董事，該公司代表蒂森的美國利益，並且在美國參戰後他繼續為該銀行工作。誘人的布希至少還是其中一家公司的董事會成員
https://amp.theguardian.com/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar#click%3Dhttps%3A%2F%2Ft.co%2Fs5Jlhtg9X6
1934 年華爾街政變失敗
美國自由聯盟 vs 史沫特萊巴特勒將軍
https://www.counterpunch.org/2011/12/02/wall-streets-failed-1934-coup/
美國在1950 年代開始資助一項生物戰計劃，與日本臭名昭著的731 部隊合作。此知情。
https://www.moonofalabama.org/2020/09/cia-intercepts-suggest-us-lied-about-biological-weapon-use-during-its-war-on-korea.html揭露：長期被壓抑的美國在北韓生物戰的官方報告
作者：傑弗裡·S·凱
https://medium.com/insurge-intelligence/the-long-suppressed-korean-war-report-on-us-use-of-biological-weapons-released-at-last-20d83f5cee54
隱藏的戰爭罪行：韓戰期間美國對中國進行炭疽轟炸
以下文章提供了有關美國在韓戰期間進行的生物戰行動的令人震驚的細節和事實，特別是使用炭疽作為生物武器…
https://jeff-kaye.medium.com/a-concealed-war-crime-us-anthrax-bombings-of-china-during-the-korean-war-14782ceb40a9
很少有人比 731 部隊領導人石井四郎更了解如何在生物武器攻擊中製造人為流行病。
以下是他向駐滿洲關東軍軍醫師、協助731部隊研究和運作的梶塚龍二少將所表達的擔憂（摘自蘇聯哈巴羅夫斯克731部隊戰爭罪行審判筆錄，第299頁）
因此，TF Mou 的《太陽背後的人》顯然計劃在今年發行 4K 藍光版本，這是一部關於 731 部隊的極其令人不安的恐怖電影。
本書的整個第三部分都致力於討論自民黨、中央情報局和黑幫鐵三角的兒玉時代。
Gen Ho Chi Minh · July 8, 2022
Who was Yoshio Kodama
Who was Yoshio Kodama?
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/Who-was-Yoshio-Kodama?ch=10&oid=74404503&share=48c21554&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
Gen Ho Chi Minh · July 8, 2022
How The CIA Helped The Yakuza & The LDP Get Power & Promote Nuclear Power
How The CIA Helped The Yakuza & The LDP Get Power & Promote Nuclear Power
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/How-The-CIA-Helped-The-Yakuza-The-LDP-Get-Power-Promote-Nuclear-Power?ch=10&oid=74404229&share=fefb8780&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
Gen Ho Chi Minh · July 9, 2022
Abe's political party--A paragraph from American Exception discusses its establishment by yakuza/fascist war criminals rescued by the CIA to help re-establish the Anticommintern under US auspices after WW2:
Crazy how the US reconstituted its own Anticommintern with Nazis and Japanese/Italian fascists. Kodama was a major figure in the Asian Peoples Anticommunist League whiac later merged in WACL--all established (like the LDP) with dubious funding from war looting and then drugs.
https://genhochiminh.quora.com/Abes-political-party-A-paragraph-from-American-Exception-discusses-its-establishment-by-yakuza-fascist-war-criminals-r?ch=10&oid=74511520&share=ed755083&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
也推薦《研究日本戰爭罪行紀錄》——後半段講述的是美國佔領當局如何逆向釋放戰犯。
日本防衛大臣岸信夫（也是安倍晉三的兄弟）在電視直播中承認，他與統一教會有聯繫，他們在選舉期間幫助了他，儘管憲法規定宗教參與政治是非法的，但他沒有面臨任何後果。
可以肯定的是，自民黨、中央情報局和李承晚（韓國獨裁者）確實創建了穆尼教堂，作為亞洲格拉迪奧反共行動的一部分。
文牧師：邪教領袖、中央情報局資產和布希家族的朋友
文鮮明牧師的去世有望結束美國安全工業綜合體歷史上最奇怪的篇章之一。這位自稱「彌賽亞」的人擁有包括卡爾武器公司在內的數十家企業，並曾聲稱自己主持過...
https://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL1209/S00029/reverend-moon-cult-leader-cia-asset-and-bush-family-friend.htm
統一教會召開記者會以控制損失，並聲稱安倍晉三不是其成員。然而，在同一次演講中，一名成員表示“我們失去了一位偉大的領導人”，據報道，2020年安倍任命的內閣中有12人是UC成員，還有日本會議成員
安倍晉三上台後，他做的第一件事就是將講述他的家族歷史或日本二戰歷史的黑暗事件定為非法，只強制執行愛國日本教育。
Mike Huckabee 和 Ishu Nagamato...2006 年...有點奇怪的組合：福音派傳教士和可能的黑幫。
安倍的主要目標之一是廢除憲法第九條，但由於公眾壓力，這一目標仍未實現。日本憲法中所謂的「和平條款」。它指出“日本人民永遠放棄戰爭作為國家主權，放棄以武力威脅或使用武力作為解決國際爭端的手段。”進一步的規定限制日本祇能維持有限的「自衛隊」（SDF），並禁止發展具有進攻能力的大型軍隊。隨著時間的推移，它成為日本民族認同的重要組成部分，這讓軍國主義者非常沮喪。它被認為使日本捲入了伊拉克戰爭。
安倍晉三是法西斯組織日本會議的成員。他們聲稱日本帝國的戰爭罪行是誇大或捏造的，並讚揚日本殖民主義從西方“解放”了亞洲。 2014年，安倍內閣成員中有15/18是日本會議成員。
秘密操縱日本的邪教
日本會議是一個由日本一些最有權勢的人組成的小邪教，旨在讓日本恢復二戰前的帝國「榮耀」。週日的選舉可能會進一步推進其目標。
https://t.co/tuYucxysrx
安倍不顧中韓兩國的反對，多次參拜靖國神社。靖國神社供奉日本戰犯。
1938年，希特勒青年團參拜靖國神社。
安倍拒絕承認日本二戰時期的性奴役制度，即美其名曰「慰安婦」制度。他否認並考慮廢除 1993 年《河野聲明》，該聲明承認慰安婦並向其道歉。
日本會收回對性奴隸的道歉嗎？ - PRX 的世界
日本新首相暗示他將修改具有里程碑意義的性奴隸聲明，以「前瞻性聲明」取代二戰道歉。
https://theworld.org/stories/2013-01-04/will-japan-retract-its-sex-slave-apology
2015年，安倍晉三和朴槿惠（韓國總統、美國女兒）扶植獨裁者朴正熙（日文名高木正男，曾在日本滿洲國陸軍服役）資料顯示朴正熙宣誓效忠日本陸軍）達成了一項幫助前「慰安婦」的協議。
Korean Peninsula Uncensored: Occupied AmericanZone · December 13, 2021
RIP People's Republic of Korea (1945-1946), short lived Socialist government of a unified Korea based on a network of people's committees before the Amerikkkan installed fascists took over
People's Republic of Korea - Wikipedia On September 6, 1945 the Korean people came together and declared a People's Republic of Korea. One single country. On September 7, 1945, US troops landed in South Korea. US dissolved this single, unified, and Democratically elected Government. Find this book on Southern Korea in the days after US military landed in Sept 1945, full of astonishing passages, including Hodge's greatest blunder: refusing to recognize & then outlawing the People's Republic founded in both N&S. In fact, US General keeps fascist Japanese policemen on in their part of Korea, instead of allowing control of Korea to fall into Korean hands! The US military government outlawed the PRK on December 12, 1945. Koreans protested USA keeping fascist policemen...the very next day! Heck... even Americans were upset at this! Look at this letter to the editor sent to New York Times. FBI files on Syngman Rhee (US backed puppet and first president of Occupied Korea) was not in Korea between 1904-1946. Well, as we all know, Freedom of speech is important and capitalist America never bans or curtails these freedoms... (New York Times, Sept 7, 1946) Freeedom...... British Journalist Alan Winnington observed the Korean war. At the time, people claimed he was exaggerating ... but.... Oddly enough, declassified files said he was telling the truth. Alleged communists massacred under the eyes of American soldiers According to Alan Winnington... there is no doubt who started this war: 🇺🇸 But, he was called a traitor (even though he was British) by US News and World Report. The Audacity. This bizarre headline is trying very hard to make the Russians look bad. So 10 American girls landed in Korea and the Russians got them dinner and very drunk and kept on dancing with them till morning. My favorite part of this spin is the "violent dancing" "Violent Dancing" In older literature, they seem to call this man Kim Koo or Kim Ko. Later, it changes to Kim Go or Kim Gu The election in South Korea was boycotted by every non-fascist party including a pretty right-winged party. Source: CIA All of this is sounding so...er... free and Democratic Even New York Times was baffled by how the Americans let the Japanese Fascists in US-occupied Korea keep their positions. Look at the framing. The communists in Korea were the ones hiding in mountains for 30 years waging resistance against the Japanese. The "patriots" were either a) collaborating with the Japanese or b)enjoying themselves in the US. State Department Memo. Look at the date: 1944. This is actually Kim Jong Un's grandfather Kim Il Sung in 1951. You can see the family resemblance! This is Park Chung Hee. He adopted the Japanese name Takgi Masao as he served in the imperial army of Japan. He was later installed as President of ROK by the US. Data Show Park Chung-hee Pledged Allegiance to Japanese Army Kim Il Sung and Kim Gu discussing re-unification. The US originally thought Kim Gu was a puppet. He was right-leaning. But he was also a patriot. He disobeyed the US and tried to unify Korea. Obviously... Kim Gu got killed by a CIA trained assasin for this "sin" Western lie: North Korea has no religious freedom. Truth: This is Kang Lang Uk. He was a presybtarian minister and went to American missionary school. Later, while still continuing to be a minister, he served as a deputy prime minister in DPRK. Syngman Rhee seemed to be well connected in Washington. In 1905, he was meeting with T. Roosevelt. Looks like Syngman Rhee did the "Juan Guaido" (of Venezuela today). Why is he called the "president" when Korea is still under Japanese occupation? Who elected him? OSS document about the "Korean exile" groups in 1945. Same OSS report. I love it when US intelligence agencies tell on themselves :) Again.. the OSS mentions Syngman Rhee's group having er... "few but influential" followers. So all the exile groups were united in their disapproval of Syngman Rhee. Again, this is the US intelligence that is making this claim. Another CIA internal memo about Rhee. "Unpopular" "unreliable" More Gems from the CIA. So funny... even when unified and occupied by Chinese, Japanese, USA and USSR... they refer to the land as "the Hermit Kingdom" Pay attention to these people...they later became parts of the ROK government
https://historyofoccupiedkorea.quora.com/RIP-Peoples-Republic-of-Korea-1945-1946-short-lived-Socialist-government-of-a-unified-Korea-based-on-a-network-of-pe?ch=10&oid=56050449&share=2d0f806d&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
然而，沒有與受害者協商，協議也沒有反映他們的要求。
安倍後來重申了自己的立場，即「慰安婦」制度不是戰爭罪。韓國「慰安婦」抗議與日本達成協議
幼稚園醜聞怎麼辦？
這讓我想起烏克蘭的「希特勒青年」亞速營兒童
嗯，我的意思是…
在安倍的領導下，政府取消了對在日朝鮮人在日本就讀的朝鮮學校的補貼，並對在日朝鮮人採取了強硬立場。在日韓國人經歷系統性的歧視和困難。
日本朝鮮學校面臨的生存危機
日本約 70 所朝鮮學校遭到政府削減資金，並成為民族主義組織的攻擊目標。
https://t.co/hCG2dADzEi
安倍也把目標瞄準了在日本殖民主義和美帝國主義雙重統治下遭受雙重苦難的沖繩。 2019年，儘管70%以上的沖繩民眾在公投中投了反對票，安倍還是同意遷移沖繩美軍基地。
沖繩公投否決美國新軍事基地，但安倍可能會繼續推進
東京認為邊野古新基地有爭議的計畫是美國安全聯盟的關鍵
https://t.co/JZALvOPvLT
美國是一個右翼極端主義國家，因此他們將像安倍晉三這樣的右翼極端主義視為一種中間派溫和派。
這就是為什麼未來幾天沒有美國媒體會說「安倍晉三的遺產」包括成為日本凱吉的成員，日本凱吉是一個異教法西斯邪教，想要復興二戰前的日本帝國和帝國崇拜。
https://t.co/tdRPOnLqeK日本會議 - 維基百科
日本極右派組織日本會議（日本會議，字面意思是「日本會議」）[21]是日本最大的極端保守派[22]和極端民族主義極右派[23]非政府組織和遊說團體。 [24] 該組織成立於1997年，截至2020年約有38,000至40,000名成員。 2014年10月，480名日本國會議員中有289人屬於該組織。許多大臣和少數首相，包括現任首相岸田文雄、[30]麻生太郎、安倍晉三、菅義偉等都是成員。 [31] 該組織將其目標描述為“基於東京法庭將歷史視為根本問題的觀點，改變戰後的民族意識”，並修改日本現行憲法，[32] 特別是第 9 條，該條禁止維持常備軍。 [33] 該組織也旨在促進愛國主義教育，支持對靖國神社的正式參拜，並促進對國家神道的民族主義解釋。 [34] [35] [36] [37] 它也否認二戰期間日本招募的慰安婦、性工作者被迫工作。用日本會議頗具影響力的成員加瀨英明的話來說，“我們致力於我們的保守事業。我們是君主主義者。我們是為了修改憲法。我們是為了國家的榮耀。” [38] 目標[編輯] Nippon Kaigi 將該組織的六個官方目標描述為： [39] 「日本未來的美麗傳統主權」（美しい伝統の國柄を明日の日本へ）：培養日本的團結意識和團結意識。 「適合新時代的新憲法」（新しい時代にふさわしい新憲法を）：恢復國防權，糾正權利與義務失衡，加強對家庭制度的重視，放鬆政教分離。 「保護國家聲譽和人民生命的政治」（國の名譽と國民の命を守る政治を）：透過在歷史辯論和危機管理中採取更積極的立場來解決公共利益在政治和政府中的損失。 「創造培養日本認同感的教育」（日本の感性をはぐくむ教育の創造を）：解決日本教育體系中出現的各種問題（欺凌、賣淫等）並建立對日本國旗和國歌的尊重日本，以及國家歷史、文化與傳統。 「國の安全を高め世界への平與貢獻を」：強化日本防衛力量，以抗衡中國、朝鮮、俄羅斯等敵對勢力，緬懷日本陣亡將士。「共生共栄の心でむすぶ世界との友善を」：透過社會文化交流計畫與外國建立友好關係。氮
https://t.co/6R3daDpenQ
結果，搜尋「安倍晉三否認日本戰爭罪」：西方媒體的戰爭機器將安倍描繪成一個仁慈的國際主義者（「讓世界變得更美好」的文章只是讚揚安倍在「印太戰爭」中扮演了有用的白痴） 」地區），而下一篇文章則挑選「好的」中國人的聲音來聽，故意將「壞」的中國人視為非理性和虐待狂。
中國對日本極右翼分子的批評唯一可以被視為有效的方法是韓國人也說同樣的話。韓國的憤怒是「可以理解的」。中國人的憤怒是「野蠻的」。這就是北約納粹自我想像中的「好亞洲人」和「壞亞洲人」。
西方會用「希特勒」這個詞提醒我們，當歐洲人種族滅絕其他歐洲人，或者當他們想對非西方國家發動戰爭時，中國應該效仿被佔領的朝鮮，為日本的「慰安婦」遺產支付受害者費用
獎勵：北約對日本的戰爭
GeoPolitical Economy & Multipolarity · February 9, 2023
Part 2: Why Shinzo Abe Was Assassinated: Towards a ‘United States of Europe’ and a League of Nations
Author: Cynthia Chung As already discussed in my paper “Part 1: Is Japan Willing to Cut Its Own Throat in Sacrifice to the U.S. Pivot to Asia? ”, to which this paper is a follow-up, Japan has become the ticking time bomb for the world economy. This is not an unexpected outcome for Japan but has been in the works for the last 50 years as a policy outlook of the Trilateral Commission (though is not limited to this institution). It is in fact the League of Nations’ vision that has been on the wish list of those who began WWI in hopes that the world would accept a one world government of regionalisations in service to an empire. It is what orchestrated the Great Depression to again attempt an implementation of a League of Nations outlook through the rise of a “National Socialist” brand of fascism seen in Italy and Germany (which would not have been possible without an economic crisis). And it was what launched a Second World War in a desperate attempt to forcefully implement such a vision onto the world (for more this refer here and here.) It has always been about obtaining a League of Nations organization for the world and those who have called themselves democrats have often found themselves in the same room as those who called themselves fascists in order to see such a vision through. As Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, the father of Pan-Europeanism (who happened to also be pro-fascist), wrote in his 1943 autobiography “A Crusade for Pan-Europe”: “The Anti-Fascists hated Hitler…yet they…paved the way to his successes. For these anti-Fascists succeeded in transforming Mussolini, Hitler’s strongest enemy during the years of 1933 and 1934, into Hitler’s strongest ally. I don’t blame the Italian and Spanish anti-Fascists for their brave and very natural fight against their ruthless political enemies. But I blame the democratic politicians, especially in France…they treated Mussolini as an ally of Hitler till he became one.” According to Kalergi, and many other ‘elites’ of similar pedigree, it was an inevitability that a fascist Pan-European rule should occur, and Kalergi expressed his clear disdain for anti-fascist and democratic resistance to this ‘inevitability’. From Kalergi’s standpoint, because of the anti-fascist and democratic resistance to a more ‘peaceful’ transference to fascism, they had created a situation where fascism would have to be imposed on them with violent force. It was a tragedy in the eyes of Kalergi that could have been avoided if these countries had simply accepted fascism on ‘democratic’ terms. Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi would write in his other autobiography “An Idea Conquers the World”: “The use of mass hypnotism for propaganda purposes is most successful at times of crisis. When National Socialism made its bid for power, millions of Germans had been thrown completely off their balance: middle-class families had sunk to the level of the proletariat, whilst working-class families were without work. The Third Reich became the last hope for the stranded, of those who had lost their social status, and of those rootless beings who were seeking a new basis for an existence that had become meaningless… The economic background of the Hitler movement becomes apparent when one recalls that Hitler’s two revolutions coincided with Germany’s two great economic crises: the inflation of 1923 and the recession of the early 1930s, with its wave of unemployment. During the six intervening years, which were relatively prosperous for Germany, the Hitler movement was virtually non-existent.” [emphasis added] The father of Pan-Europeanism and spiritual father of the European Union, Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi, often spoke well of Austrian and Italian fascism and even Catholic fascism, and thus the above quote by him takes on another layer of eeriness. Kalergi acknowledges that Hitler’s rise would not have been possible if there had not been two periods of extreme economic crisis for Germany. The question is, were these crises organic in their occurrence or rather engineered? In Kalergi’s 1954 autobiography “An Idea Conquers the World,” he writes: “there is not doubt that Hitler’s popularity rested mainly on the fanatical struggle which he waged against the Versailles Treaty.” If we look at the political ecosystem Kalergi was navigating in, we get some hints to such a question, which included such men as Max Warburg, Baron Louis Rothschild, Herbert Hoover, Secretary of State Frank Kellogg, Owen D. Young, Bernard Baruch, Walter Lippmann, Colonel House, General Tasker Bliss, Hamilton Fish Armstrong, Thomas Lamont, Justice Hughes. All of these men are named by Kalergi directly as his support base in the United States in his autobiography. They were adamantly supportive of Kalergi’s Pan-Europeanism, aka a “United States of Europe,” were staunch supporters of a League of Nations vision and were architects within the Paris Peace Conference (1919-1920) which was responsible for the Treaty of Versailles which launched Germany into its first wave of extreme economic crisis. (For more on this story refer here.) In my previous paper, “Part 1: Is Japan Willing to Cut Its Own Throat in Sacrifice to the U.S. Pivot to Asia?” I discussed how this is the very goal of the Trilateral Commission, to create economic crises in order to push through extreme structural reforms. Financial analyst and historian Alex Krainer writes: “The [Trilateral] commission was co-founded in July of 1973 by David Rockefeller, Zbigniew Brzezinski and a group of American, European and Japanese bankers, public officials and academics including Alan Greenspan and Paul Volcker. It was set up to foster close cooperation among nations that constituted the three-block architecture of today’s western empire. That ‘close cooperation’ was intended as the very foundation of the empire’s ‘three block agenda,’ as formulated by the stewards of the undead British Empire.” Its formation would be organised by Britain’s hand in America, the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), (aka: the offspring of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, the leading think tank for the British Crown). On Nov 9th, 1978, Trilateral Commission member Paul Volcker (Federal Reserve Chairman from 1979-1987) would affirm at a lecture delivered at Warwick University in England: “A controlled disintegration in the world economy is a legitimate object for the 1980s.” This is also the ideology that has shaped Milton Friedman’s “Shock Therapy”. In 1975 the CFR launched a public study of global policy titled the 1980’s Project. The general theme was “controlled disintegration” of the world economy, and the report did not attempt to hide the famine, social chaos, and death its policy would bring upon most of the world’s population. This is precisely what Japan has been undergoing, and which economist Richard Werner demonstrated in his book Princes of Yen, to which a documentary by the same name was made. That Japan’s economy was put through a manufactured bubble in order to create an economic crisis that would then justify the need for extreme structural reform. We will now briefly discuss how the United States, the Tiger Economies and Europe have also been put through the same process of manufactured economic crises and what this means for the world today, what has been the consequence for Europe in following a “United States of Europe” model and how does the one world government model of a League of Nations differ from the multipolar framework made up of sovereign nation states. I will conclude this paper with remarks on why Shinzo Abe was assassinated. Colonialism 2.0: The Asian Economic Crisis of the Tiger Economies Japan was not the only high-performance economy in Asia that in the 1990s found itself in the deepest recession since the Great Depression. In 1997, the currencies of the Southeast Asian Tiger Economies could not maintain a fixed exchange rate with the U.S. dollar. They collapsed by between 60-80% within a year. The causes for this crash went as far back as 1993. In that year, the Asian Tiger Economies – South Korea, Thailand, Indonesia – implemented a policy of aggressive deregulation of their capital accounts and the establishment of international banking facilities, which enabled the corporate and banking sectors to borrow liberally from abroad, the first time in the postwar era that borrowers could do so. In reality, there was no need for the Asian Tiger Economies to borrow money from abroad. All the money necessary for domestic investment could be created at home. The Princes of Yen documentary remarks: “Indeed the pressure to liberalise capital flows came from outside. Since the early 1990s, the IMF, the World Trade Organization and the U.S. Treasury had been lobbying these countries to allow domestic firms to borrow from abroad. They argued that neoclassical economics had proven that free markets and free capital movement increased economic growth. Once the capital accounts had been deregulated, the central banks set about creating irresistible incentives for domestic firms to borrow from abroad by making it more expensive to borrow in their own domestic currencies than it was to borrow in U.S. dollars. The central banks emphasised in their public statements that they would maintain fixed exchange rates with the U.S. dollar, so that borrowers did not have to worry about paying back more in their domestic currencies than they had originally borrowed. Banks were ordered to increase lending. But they were faced with less loan demand from the productive sectors of the economy, because these firms had been given incentives to borrow from abroad instead. They therefore had to resort to increasing their lending to higher-risk borrowers. Imports began to shrink, because the central banks had agreed to peg their currencies to the U.S. dollar. The economies became less competitive, but their current-account balance was maintained due to the foreign issued loans, which count as exports in the balance-of-payments statistics. When speculators began to sell the Thai baht, the Korean won and the Indonesian rupee, the respective central banks responded with futile attempts to maintain the peg until they had squandered virtually all of their foreign exchange reserves. This gave foreign lenders ample opportunity to withdraw their money at the overvalued exchange rates. The central banks knew that if the countries ran out of foreign exchange reserves, they would have to call in the IMF to avoid default. And once the IMF came in, the central banks knew what this Washington-based institution would demand, for its demands in such cases had been the same for the previous three decades: the central banks would be made independent [and subservient to the IMF diktat]. On the 16th of July the Thai Finance Minister took a plane to Tokyo to ask Japan for a bailout. At the time Japan had USD $213 billion in foreign exchange reserves, more than the total resources of the IMF. They were willing to help but Washington stopped Japan’s initiative. Any solution to the emerging Asian Crisis had to come from Washington via the IMF. After two months of speculative attacks the Thai government floated the baht. The IMF to date has promised almost $120 billion USD to the embattled economies of Thailand, Indonesia and South Korea. Immediately upon arrival in the crisis-stricken countries, the IMF teams set up offices inside the central banks, from where they dictated what amounted to terms of surrender. The IMF demanded a string of policies, including curbs on central bank and bank credit creation, major legal changes and sharp rises in interest rates. As interest rates rose, high risk borrowers began to default on their loans. Burdened with large amounts of bad debts, the banking systems of Thailand, Korea, and Indonesia were virtually bankrupt. Even otherwise healthy firms started to suffer from the widening credit crunch. Corporate bankruptcies soared. Unemployment rose to the highest levels since the 1930s.” The IMF knew well what the consequences of its policies would be. In the Korean case, they even had detailed but undisclosed studies prepared, that had calculated just how many Korean companies would go bankrupt if interest rates were to rise by five percentage points. The IMF’s first agreement with Korea demanded a rise of exactly five percentage points in interest rates. Richard Werner stated in an interview: “The IMF policies are clearly not aimed at creating economic recoveries in the Asian countries. They pursue quite a different agenda and that is to change the economic, political and social systems in those countries. In fact, the IMF deals prevent the countries concerned, like Korea, Thailand, to reflate.” Interviewer: “Interesting. So you’re saying it’s making the crisis worse and you’re suggesting that the IMF has a hidden agenda?” Richard Werner responded: “Well, it’s not very hidden this agenda because the IMF quite clearly demands that the Asian countries concerned have to change the laws so that foreign interests can buy anything from banks to land. And in fact, the banking systems can only be recapitalised, according to the IMF deals, by using foreign money which is not necessary at all, because as long as these countries have central banks, they could just print money and recapitalise the banking systems. You don’t need foreign money for that. So the agenda is clearly to crack open Asia for foreign interests.” The IMF demanded that troubled banks not be bailed out, but instead closed down and sold off cheaply as distressed assets, often to large U.S. investment banks. In most cases the IMF-dictated-letters-of-intent explicitly stated that the banks had to be sold to foreign investors. In Asia, government organised bailouts to keep ailing financial institutions alive were not allowed. But when a similar crisis struck back home in America a year later, the very same institutions reacted differently. The Princes of Yen documentary remarks: “The Connecticut based hedge fund Long-Term Capital Management, which accepted as clients only high-net-worth individual investors and institutions, had leveraged its $5 billion USD in client capital, by more than 25 times, borrowing more than $100 billion USD from the world’s banks. When its losses had threatened to undermine the banks that had lent to it, with the possibility of a systemic banking crisis that would endanger the U.S. financial system and economy, the Federal Reserve organised a cartel-like bailout by leaning on Wall Street and international banks to contribute funds so that it could avoid default. Why would the United States make demands on foreign nations in the name of the free market, when it has no intention of enforcing the same rules within its own borders? The examples of the Japanese and Asian crises illustrate how crises can be engineered to facilitate the redistribution of economic ownership, and to implement legal, structural and political change.” The reason why the Asian banks were forbidden to be saved, was so there could be a foreign buy-out of these Asian economies. Who needed the British East-India Co. when you now had the IMF ensuring the empire’s colonial objectives? The IMF and Trilateral Commission’s “not so Hidden” Agenda The IMF has clearly set its sights on a western banking take-over of Asia, but what was the “agenda” for Europe and the United States who were located within this sphere of influence? Were they destined to benefit from the plunders of the empire? The short answer to this, which should be evident by now, is no. The manufactured crises in the United States and Europe were to further centralise power amongst an ever smaller grouping and clearly not for the benefit of the people, or shall we say subjects of the land, who happen to be living in these regions. Europe has particularly done a number on itself due to its adherence to a “United States of Europe” vision. Countries within the Euro currency bloc had forfeited their right to a national currency and handed this power to the European Central Bank (ECB), the most powerful and secretive of all central banks. Under such a system, no European country has control over its own economy and is completely exposed to whatever the ECB decides. Richard Werner remarked: “They [ECB] have to focus more on credit creation rather than interest rates. The ECB has a lot to learn from its past mistakes, because basically I don’t think it really watched credit creation carefully enough. Where in Spain, Ireland, we had massive credit expansion, under the watch of the ECB, interest rates are of course the same in the Eurozone, but the quantity of credit cycle is very different…There is one interest rate for the whole euro area but in 2002 the ECB told the Bundesbank [central bank of Germany] to reduce its credit creation by the biggest amount in its history and told the Irish central bank to print as much money as if there was no tomorrow. What do you expect is going to happen? Same interest rate. Is it the same growth? No. Recession in Germany, boom in Ireland. Which variable tells you that? Credit creation.” From 2004 under the ECB’s watch, bank credit growth in Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Spain increased by over 20% per annum and property prices sky-rocketed. When bank credit fell, property prices collapsed, developers went bankrupt and the banking systems of Ireland, Portugal, Spain and Greece became insolvent. The Princes of Yen documentary remarks: “The ECB could have prevented these bubbles just as it could have ended the ensuing banking and economic crises. But it refused to do so until major political concessions had been made, such as the transfer of fiscal and budgeting powers from each sovereign state to the European Union. In both Spain and Greece, youth unemployment has been pushed up to 50%, forcing many youths to seek employment abroad. The deliberations of the ECB’s decision-making bodies are secret. The mere attempt at influencing the ECB, for instance through democratic debate and discussion, is forbidden according to the Maastricht Treaty. The ECB is an international organisation that is above and outside the laws of jurisdictions of any individual nation. Its senior staff carry diplomatic passports and the files and documents inside the European Central Bank cannot be searched or impounded by any police force or public prosecutor. The European Commission, an unelected group whose aim is to build a ‘United States of Europe,’ with all the trappings of a unified state has an interest in weaking individual governments and the influence of the democratic parliaments of Europe. It turns out that the evidence for central-bank independence that was relied upon in the Maastricht Treaty derived from a single study that was commissioned by none other than the European Commission itself.” The Fascist Roots of the ‘United States of Europe’ On February 15th, 1930, Churchill published in The Saturday Evening an articled titled “The United States of Europe,” where he wrote:[1] “…The resuscitation of the Pan-European idea is largely identified with Count Coudenhove-Kalergi…The League of Nations, from which the United States have so imprudently – considering their vast and increasing interests – absented themselves, has perforce become in fact, if not in form, primarily a European institution. Count Coudenhove-Kalergi proposes to concentrate European forces, interests and sentiments in a single branch which, if it grew, would become the trunk itself, and thus acquire obvious predominance. For think how mighty Europe is, but for its divisions! Let Russia slide back, as Count Kalergi proposes, and as it is already so largely a fact, into Asia. Let the British Empire, excluded in his plan, realize its own world-spread ideal, even so, the mass of Europe, once united, once federalized or partially federalized, once continentally self-conscious-Europe, with its African and Asiatic possessions and plantations, would constitute an organism beyond compare.” [emphasis added] In Count Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi’s “An Idea Conquers the World” he writes: “I discovered to my surprise that the feeling of European consciousness had first shown itself during the Crusades. After the fall of the Roman Empire the Crusades represented the most vigorous display of European solidarity. For a time, feuds between kings, princes and cities were submerged in a common cause…Finally, in 1834, Mazzini founded Young Europe, a movement designed to coordinate all existing revolutionary movements with a view to building up a new and united Europe on a basis of nationalism and democracy.” [emphasis added] Interestingly Kalergi would write that Giuseppe Mazzini who Kalergi considered the most modern organizer towards a “united Europe on a basis of nationalism and democracy” was also considered the forerunner of fascism in Italy. Kalergi writes:[2] “Fascism at that time [in Italy] had not yet broken with parliamentarism and democracy. The new Italian government was a government of coalition; it respected the principle of constitutional monarchy, pretending only to give it new vigor and authority. It appealed to the heroic instincts of youth, to the spirit of sacrifice and of idealism. It tried to restore the respect for religious values and the glorious traditions of ancient Rome. It hailed the memory of Mazzini as a forerunner of Fascism.” [emphasis added] The theme of the Crusaders would be central to Kalergi’s idea for a Pan-Europe, to which he even incorporated the symbol of the Crusaders within his flag for the Pan-European cause. In his 1943 autobiography, Kalergi further expands on his theme of the Crusader of Pan-Europe:[3] “I chose the sign of the red cross superimposed on a golden sun as the emblem of our movement. The red cross, which had been the flag of the medieval crusaders, seemed the oldest known symbol of supra-national European brotherhood. In more recent times it has also gained recognition as a symbol of international relief work. The sun was chosen to represent the achievements of European culture in helping to illuminate the world. Thus, Hellenism and Christianity – the cross of Christ and the sun of Apollo – figured side by side as the twin enduring pillars of European civilization.” [emphasis added] This idea of a “United States of Europe”, Kalergi’s “Pan-Europe” vision was a clever and dishonest play on words. The United States had originally existed in the form of 13 colonies beholden to the British Empire. However, when the United States maneuvered for independence from the British Empire by organizing itself into a sovereign nation state, the founding fathers unified the new republic around a system of Hamiltonian banking. This innovation in political economy converted unpayable debts into a new system of federal credit, enacted federal protectionism to favor local industrial growth and vectored the banks around investments which improved the General Welfare. Thus, the United States was able to form one currency and a national bank to facilitate trade which upheld the economic sovereignty of the newly created nation. This Hamiltonian economic organization in turn influenced German economist Friedrich List’s “The National System of Political Economy” which led to the Zollverein. Germany at the time was also divided into regions like the United States (Germany had never really been a nation up until this point) and the Zollverein allowed for Germany to begin establishing itself as a sovereign nation state for the first time in history. Friedrich List had directly referred to the Hamiltonian economic system as his inspiration for Germany. This system had also influenced Sun Yat-sen the father of the Republic of China in his “The Three Principles of the People” which was a direct reference to Lincoln/Henry C. Carey’s economic program which itself was a continuation of Alexander Hamilton’s economic principles. This was also revived in the form of American pro-Lincoln economists in Japan who helped organize the industrial growth program begun with the Meiji Restoration. This is what the multi-polar framework is continuing, the defense and growth of sovereign nation-states. Yes, there is regional cooperation. You need regional cooperation for big infrastructure projects, such as rail, that will involve numerous nations. But regional cooperation should not be confused with a League of Nations vision and we can easily tell the difference between the two in terms of what is actually being proposed politically and economically. I will be writing a paper in the near future to address this subject more directly but for now I would refer the reader here for more on this. In the case of the League of Nations, Pan-Europe, United States of Europe etc. etc. vision, it was the very opposite. It was to take power away from the sovereign nation-state framework and transform nations into vassal states subservient to systems of empire. That is, the “United States of Europe” was a dishonest and misleading reference to the original 13 American colonies. It was dishonest because instead of promoting further national economic sovereignty, the nations within Europe were expected to remove their sovereignty and be beholden to a centralised control through a European Union (centralised political power) and European Central Bank (centralised economic power) and NATO (centralised military power). No country within Europe would have control over their political, economic or military destiny within such a stranglehold. In order for the League of Nations vision to take-over, sovereign nation-states would have to be dismantled. For more on this story refer to my book “The Empire on Which the Black Sun Never Set.” What the American and European economic crises have taught us is that the tax-payer will be made to pay for the increasing centralised take-over of what were once sovereign economies in order to empower a very small grouping of people, as the rights and welfare of average citizens are increasingly viewed as irrelevant. Why Shinzo Abe was Assassinated Former Prime Minister of Japan Shinzo Abe was assassinated July 8th, 2022, and though no longer in the position of Prime Minister of Japan at the time of his assassination (having served from 2006-2007 and 2012- September 16, 2020) he was the longest serving prime minister in Japanese history and continued to exert major influence on policy-shaping within Japan. News of Abe’s assassination was received around the world with an admixture of very strong emotion from both extremes. Some were horrified by his death and praised what he had done for Japan as something almost saintly. Others ecstatically celebrated his death, thinking no possible good could come from him due to his attempts to revive the dark side of Japan’s imperial past and his public displays of tribute to the Japanese fascists from WWII. When the news was still fresh and the frenzy of confusion at its peak, many even blamed China for the orchestration of Abe’s death, thinking they were clearly the ones to benefit from such an act. It is true that Abe had a very dangerous and destructive mission to restore Japan to its status as an imperialistic empire. He was a corrupt insider who pushed for the dangerous privatization of the Japanese government and increased the gap between the wealthy and middle-class citizens. However, it is also too simplistic as to celebrate his death as an absolute triumph. As we can clearly see seven months after Abe’s assassination, Japan has not become more peaceful and ready for dialogue with its eastern partners but rather has become much more bellicose and stauncher in its cooperation with the increasingly war frenzied western demands. Japan has also greatly severed motion towards greater economic and political cooperation with Russia and China, which was still moving forward when Abe was alive. It is also interesting to note that Abe was assassinated weeks before Pelosi’s Circus Tour to Taiwan. Although Pelosi’s provocation did not amount to any military confrontation, we cannot say that that was not its intention, nor that things could have played out very differently in terms of a military confrontation between China and the United States. The reader should be reminded that in 2014, Japan had changed or “reinterpreted” its constitution which gave more powers to the Japan Self-Defense Forces, allowing them to “defend other allies” in case of war being declared upon them. The United States, of course, fully supported the move. This “reinterpretation” of Japan’s constitution effectively entered it into NATO. In December 2022, Japan announced a new national security strategy. This new strategy would double defense spending. Japan also plans to invest in counter-strike capabilities, including buying U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles and developing its own weapons systems. It was precisely Abe’s grand vision of Japan returning to its “glory” days as an empire that was problematic for the League of Nations vision, for if Japan saw itself on par with other great empires, or perhaps even greater, it meant that it did not ultimately intend to bend the knee. That is, Abe was not willing to sell off Japan as a satrapy, however, that was exactly what the western diktat was essentially demanding of Japan. Under this western diktat Japan was being ordered to accept its fate to collapse economically and sink into desperation, become increasingly militaristic and extremist and lead a kamikaze charge into a war with China and Russia which would lead to the ruination of the Japanese civilization. It does not look like Abe was going to go along with that stark vision for Japan. Emanuel Pastreich wrote an insightful paper titled “The Assassination of Archduke Shinzo Abe,” one could simply just read the title and it says it all. [The article is also under the title “When the Globalists Crossed the Rubicon: the Assassination of Shinzo Abe”] Pastreich writes: “[Abe]…was already the longest serving prime minister in Japanese history, and had plans for a third bid as prime minister, when he was struck down. Needless to say, the powers behind the World Economic Forum do not want national leaders like Abe, even if they conform with the global agenda, because they are capable of organizing resistance within the nation state. …In the case of Russia, Abe successfully negotiated a complex peace treaty with Russia in 2019 that would have normalized relations and solved the dispute concerning the Northern Territories (the Kuril Islands in Russian). He was able to secure energy contracts for Japanese firms and to find investment opportunities in Russia even as Washington ramped up the pressure on Tokyo for sanctions. The journalist Tanaka Sakai notes that Abe was not banned from entering Russia after the Russian government banned all other representatives of the Japanese government from entry. Abe also engaged China seriously, solidifying long-term institutional ties, and pursuing free trade agreement negotiations that reached a breakthrough in the fifteenth round of talks (April 9-12, 2019). Abe had ready access to leading Chinese politicians and he was considered by them to be reliable and predictable, even though his rhetoric was harshly anti-Chinese. The critical event that likely triggered the process leading to Abe’s assassination was the NATO summit in Madrid (June 28-30). The NATO summit was a moment when the hidden players behind the scenes laid down the law for the new global order. NATO is on a fast track to evolve beyond an alliance to defend Europe and to become an unaccountable military power, working with the Global Economic Forum, the billionaires and the bankers around the world, as a ‘world army,’ functioning much as the British East India Company did in another era. The decision to invite to the NATO summit the leaders of Japan, South Korea, Australia and New Zealand was a critical part of this NATO transformation. These four nations were invited to join in an unprecedented level of integration in security, including intelligence sharing (outsourcing to big tech multinationals), the use of advanced weapons systems (that must be administrated by the personnel of multinationals like Lockheed Martin), joint exercises (that set a precedent for an oppressive decision-making process), and other ‘collaborative’ approaches that undermine the chain of command within the nation state. When Kishida returned to Tokyo on July first, there can be no doubt that one of his first meetings was with Abe. Kishida explained to Abe the impossible conditions that the Biden administration had demanded of Japan. The White House, by the way, is now entirely the tool of globalists like Victoria Nuland (Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs) and others trained by the Bush clan. The demands made of Japan were suicidal in nature. Japan was to increase economic sanctions on Russia, to prepare for possible war with Russia, and to prepare for a war with China. Japan’s military, intelligence and diplomatic functions were to be transferred to the emerging blob of private contractors gathering for the feast around NATO. We do not know what Abe did during the week before his death. Most likely he launched into a sophisticated political play, using of all his assets in Washington D.C., Beijing, and Moscow—as well as in Jerusalem, Berlin, and London, to come up with a multi-tiered response that would give the world the impression that Japan was behind Biden all the way, while Japan sought out a détente with China and Russia through the back door.” Let us be honest here, since the hot mess should be rather plain for everyone to see at this point; those who are in the position of pushing the IMF, NATO, World Economic Forum’s disastrous policies are not the brains in the room. The embarrassment of less than two-month former UK Prime Minister Liz Truss, who did not even know Russian territory from Ukrainian territory, responding that she would never recognise Rostov and Voronezh as Russian, is just one of too many examples that are occurring on an almost daily basis. These are the perfect tools for such insane policies for this very reason, they do not understand what outcome they are ultimately pushing. They are absolutely clueless and thus expendable as the card-board cut-outs that they are. The reality of the situation is that no nation is expected to survive this stand-off. It is not about the western bloc against the eastern bloc. It is about the ruination of all nations and the formation of one empire, or if you prefer the wording, one world government. Again, this is the League of Nations visionthat has been the wet dream of a very small grouping since the First World War. It is not about western democracy or liberalism or western value systems. It is about, and has only ever been about the reinstitution of systems of empire. This is what the First World War was about, this was what the Second World War was about and it is what the Third World War is about. Interestingly, we again see Germany and Japan positioned next to the trip-wire that is ready to launch the globe into another full-blown world war. And guess what will be the fate of those two countries, Germany and Japan, who’s automaton ‘leadership’ so foolishly think of themselves as included within the ‘elite’ grouping who will somehow survive after setting the world on fire, as they so foolishly made the mistake of thinking during the Second World War. They will see once again how expendable their people, their civilization are to this ‘elite’ grouping they so desperately want to be accepted by. One thing is for certain since Abe’s assassination. Japan is moving ever more rapidly forward on a very dangerous path that threatens it to be once again on the wrong side of history. The question is, are Germany and Japan so foolish as to make the same mistake twice, for they should not assume they will survive such a reckoning a second time. Why Shinzo Abe Was Assassinated: Towards a ‘United States of Europe’ and a League of Nations
https://ukraineuncensored.quora.com/Part-2-Why-Shinzo-Abe-Was-Assassinated-Towards-a-United-States-of-Europe-and-a-League-of-Nations?ch=17&oid=99439689&share=079b170d&srid=u717uA&target_type=post
62,700 次觀看
查看379票贊成
查看65股
特拉維夫日記
贊助
關注加薩戰爭期間以色列正在發生的事情！
免費每日通訊特拉維夫日記是保持聯繫的地方
了解更多
在日本詢問未經審查
1 個回答 · 最後關註 4小時
極樂
贊助
絲綢枕頭套真的對睡眠時的頭髮和皮膚有益嗎？
絲綢枕頭套是在睡眠時滋養頭髮和皮膚的簡單方法。
了解更多
Japan's yen falls to lowest since 1990, dollar/yen up 0.6% By Reuters April 15 (Reuters) - The yen weakened on Monday, pushing the dollar to its highest against the Japanese currency since June 1990, with markets alert to any signs of intervention from the Japanese authorities to prop up the yen. The d…
Read more
TOKYO (AP) — A civil lawsuit accusing Japanese police of racial profiling opened Monday with emotional testimony from plaintiffs who said they were constantly stopped and questioned without good reason. The case, filed in January by three residents of Japan with ove…
Read more
Asked in Japan Uncensored
Sponsored by BestBrokerz.com
Which is the best broker for Bitcoin trading?
If you want to trade Bitcoin like the pros, you should make sure you are using the right broker.
Learn More
Works at Language Interpreters
· MonG7 and the rest of the western world countries (aka, The Global North) are the REAL ENEMIES of The Global South
沒有留言:
張貼留言
注意：只有此網誌的成員可以留言。