確實，譚·馬拉卡加入了印尼共產黨（PKI），開始寫作，並成為該黨的傑出成員。
1926 年，坦·馬拉卡與印共三人領導人阿里明、蘇喬諾和穆索發生爭執，後者想要發動反對荷蘭殖民地的起義。他譴責這次起義是“民族鬥爭的自殺”，因為當時印尼的一切革命分子尚未牢固確立。他的反對後來被證明是正確的。起義徹底失敗，數以千計的政治活動人士因此被荷蘭帝國主義流放、折磨，甚至殺害。自此，譚馬拉卡決定斷絕與印尼共產黨的聯繫；他不再是永遠的印尼共產黨成員了。
在印度尼西亞，荷蘭殖民者對他感到厭惡，並開始傳播宣傳計劃以對抗他對印尼年輕人的影響。為了解決獨立鬥爭而散佈對他的誹謗。
隨著荷蘭帝國主義試圖在印尼重新掌權，印尼共產黨在政府中的影響力不斷上升，政治局勢也變得越來越激烈。隨後，陳馬拉卡成立了聯合鬥爭組織 ( Persatuan Perjuangan )，並提出了 7 項最低綱領，該組織聯合了 142 個政治組織和政黨，對抗政府與荷蘭的外交政策。
有報導稱，他是被政治陰謀謀殺的，該陰謀很可能涉及印尼共產黨和印度社會黨。另一個版本指出，AH Nasution 是譚馬拉卡之死的幕後黑手。沒有人確定譚·馬拉卡是何時何地被殺的，因為他的屍體從未被發現。但最近，荷蘭著名歷史學家、譚·馬拉卡的自傳作家哈利·A·波茲表示，譚·馬拉卡於1949 年2 月21 日在布拉維賈亞師的索克喬( Soekotjo) 中尉下令在Selo Panggung 村（東爪哇某地）被槍殺。
哈利·A·波茲（Harry A. Poeze）的新書《Tan Malaka Dihujat dan Dilupakan》中記載了這些事實，
譚馬拉卡（Tan Malaka）被殺是因為他與來自西都阿佐的老虎薩巴魯丁（Sabarudin）市長在一起。在譚馬拉卡看來，他是唯一真正與殖民者作戰的人，而事實上，薩巴魯丁捲入了與陸軍其他部門的內部糾紛。
在一次突襲中，薩巴魯丁與譚馬拉卡一起在諫義裡附近的莫喬村。這是譚·馬拉卡 (Tan Malaka) 被槍殺而薩巴魯丁 (Sabarudin) 設法逃跑的地方。
They, both the USSR and CCP, did not have time to react, as they did not predicted that the Military wiped out the Communists so quickly and efficiency only within three years.
Even Indonesian students who at that time were studying in Eastern Bloc countries suddenly found themselves becoming political exiles with no way to return home throughout the years of Suharto military regime.
The CIA really did well directing and supporting the Military in their task to destroy Indonesian Communism.
However it is important to note that this Communist purge left MILLIONS
The massacres were not lost to historians, but they fit into the pattern of confusion and suspicions of mixed allegiances during the peak of the Indonesian National Revolution. These events are usually told as examples of ethnic Chinese scapegoating, which has existed since the early colonial era.
During the revolution, more often than not, ethnic Chinese were caught in the middle of the conflict b
Actually, it is not prohibited nor taboo at all. However, since the late president Soeharto has made sure that PKI is a very dangerous and the action for the massacre is needed, people are afraid to discuss it because they may alleged as a supporter of PKI and secretly wanting PKI to arise in Indonesia again.
There are lots of people that still hates PKI, that is why a slightest rumor about them can make a huge uproar. Politician can easily use this topic if they want to discredit their opponent.
The massacre is one of the darkest history of Indonesia. It is very scary that people do not want to
Chinese-Indonesians weren't specifically targeted during 1965 massacres, but they became victims nonetheless. Most massacres and pillages were actually done in rural and semi-urban areas, the most numerous victims were farmers, villagers, and small business-owners. Many of these were because of pure greed and jealousy over better neighbors, misinformations, and unverified rumors.
Chinese-Indonesians became victims because they were already very vulnerable to begin with, and this vulnerability was exploited by Suharto's regime. One reason of their vulnerability was the question of citizenship. T
Probably because it's been superseded by a larger and more recent anti-Chinese event, ie 1965 Communist/Chinese massacre and 1998 riots. Ethnic Chinese are obviously afraid of telling the stories of the massacres, after seeing the consequences again and again and again.
It's also worth noticing that Indonesia government will not teach these kind of stories in their curriculum (obviously). That's why we never hear these tragedies being told (or if at all, in a highly politicized way), let it be Bersiap, or all of the aforementioned anti Chinese events, or the silly Konfrontasi, or annexation of
Umar Wirahadikusumah was a major general too, and he wasn’t assassinated. There were plenty of generals that didn’t get assassinated (source: Perwira Angkatan Darat Semasa G30S 1965).
Both Suharto (commander of Kostrad) and Umar (commander of Military Territorial Command, Kodam Jaya) had combat ready troops during the event. Ibrahim Adjie, commander of Siliwangi Territorial Command (the biggest army territorial command at that time), also supported them but it took time to move his troops from West Java to Jakarta. Each one of them was much more powerful than the rebels. I do not think that the
Because there was no plan to assasinate anybody. PKI leader, Aidit, and a number of leftist military officers only planned to kidnap the generals who they believed were planning a coup against Sukarno.
The plan was to kidnap and bring them to Sukarno, who was not aware of the plan, in the hope that Sukarno would then demote or outright dismiss the generals. PKI’s supreme position on the top of Indonesia’s politics would then be secured.
Things did not go as planned and a few of the generals were killed in the kidnapping process. Somebody then decided to kill the rest at Lubang Buaya. Probably in
What a dangerous question, but I will try to answer it. That dual function was the idea of General AH Nasution most likely, he had such idea which was executed by the New Order regime for 32 years, basically Nasution stressing into domestic security and contra separatist idea, by strengthening infantry than any other division such cavalry or artillery, and please don’t ask about Navy or Air Force.
Please take a look at our national heroes cemetery, most of them came from infantry division, what do you think? This nation was built by intellectual civilian but most of the heroes came from militar
They were murdered in an anti-communist massacre in 1965, over a million of them. Read this,
and see this,
https://www.amazon.com/Act-Killing-Digital-Copy/dp/B00FGVS07S/ref=mp_s_a_1_1_sspa?crid=1IKGDZY34RDBF&keywords=the+act+of+killing+blu+ray&qid=1658719700&sprefix=The+act+of+killing%2Caps%2C212&sr=8-1-spons&psc=1&smid=ABLI0FL268ZL4&spLa=ZW5jcnlwdGVkUXVhbGlmaWVyPUEzMEdJS0hPS1ZaS1QmZW5jcnlwdGVkSWQ9QTAyNzU0OTkxVENVUTdRVUlZQTNCJmVuY3J5cHRlZEFkSWQ9QTAwMzk3ODUzRElINFVTNFpQODgzJndpZGdldE5hbWU9c3BfcGhvbmVfc2VhcmNoX2F0ZiZhY3Rpb249Y2xpY2tSZWRpcmVjdCZkb05vdExvZ0NsaWNrPXRydWU=Interviews with the murderers.
The G30S is one of the biggest mysteries in modern Indonesian history and I do not think the incident has never been properly explained and verified.
Indonesia before 30 Sep, 1965
Indonesian Army (TNI) and Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI, Communist Party of Indonesia) were rivals and TNI was unhappy that President Soekarno was openly showing sympathies to PKI and thus effectively choosing a side. President’s Soekarno’s policy was what he proclaimed anti-imperialist (anti-Western) and in his socialist ideas he was leaning more towards China than USSR. When the poor economic situation, the president
沒有留言:
張貼留言
注意：只有此網誌的成員可以留言。