为什么俄罗斯是西方唯一的“共產主義受害者”?

 · 
跟随

为什么你认为俄罗斯是唯一的“受害者”?

共产主义是由德国发明的,并植入(是的,植入)了某种功能失调的俄罗斯君主制。想法是让俄罗斯退出第一次世界大战。

这是非常成功的,他们进行了第二轮,见证了布尔什维克的崛起。

如今,俄罗斯不被认为是共产主义国家,但共产主义(马克思主义)在西方学术界正在兴起。

您必须了解共产主义不是俄罗斯的“事物”,而是国际运动。早在 1920 年代,俄罗斯就经历过一种形式的敌意收购。而现在在西方,你正在经历一场友好的、温和的接管。

 · 
下列的

在 1917 年革命期间,俄罗斯帝国受到几个同时发生的低概率、高影响因素的影响:

  • 君主及其最亲密的圈子极度无能和不愿执政。
  • 世界大战给国家带来的经济混乱和心理疲惫。
  • 贵族精英和公务员对国家政治表现出完全无能和不感兴趣。
  • 大量农民获得了武器并接受了杀戮训练,而他们的指挥官,即军官团,却感到与帝国国家的利益疏远了。
  • 军队中的硬右派与自由派之间的斗争中独特的权力动态使共产党能够以相对较小的军事力量相互对抗并在首都夺取政权。

结果,在 1917 年,国家崩溃了。这个幅员辽阔的国家发现自己分裂成许多小社区,每个社区都在为自己的生存而挣扎。唯一的力量因素变成了打着不同旗号的武装团伙,在一场所有人对所有人的永久战争中。

在这场博弈中,共产党竟然是最机智、最有组织的力量。


下面,一群士兵曾为“俄罗斯所有陆海武装力量的最高领袖和总司令”海军上将亚历山大·高尔察克而战在 1919 年。从人数和资源量来看,他的部队在杂乱无章的反苏军队中是共产杀手荣耀的领跑者。然而,他们变得无法胜任这项任务。腐败、无能、内斗至高无上。

看着照片上的士兵,您绝对想不到高尔察克海军上将坐在沙皇金库中近 500 公吨的黄金上。他们看起来就像一群流浪汉,拿着一些军事道具在镜头前合影留念。一半的人没有枪支,右边的人只有一把小步兵铲作为武器。

这是俄罗斯文明在21世纪不断感染着这个国家的痼疾:俄罗斯精英们对民族没有责任感。国家回报。这就是为什么在俄罗斯有时非常容易将处于食物链顶端的顶级狗从他们舒适的椅子上踢下来。它所需要的只是决心、力量和运气。你拿下克里姆林宫,没有人会为以前坐在那里的人流泪。

GeeTest CAPTCHA
GeeTest, the creator of SlideCAPTCHA, frees your website, apps, and APIs from malicious traffic smartly.
Free Trial

无论是否有任何外部国家的参与,都不能说共产主义在任何地方都“蓬勃发展”。一个繁荣的国家不需要使用恐惧和秘密警察来压迫其人民并保持自己的权力。

使用 Sirv 优化、调整大小和延迟加载自动驾驶仪上的所有图像。加载速度提高 50%。
了解更多

First of all, Russia isn’t West, it’s East

The Scythians (30 January 1918) Alexander Blok

Eastwards you cast your eyes for many hundred years,
Greedy for our precious stones and ore,
And longing for the time when with a leer
You’d yell an order and the guns would roar.

It’s natural for the collective oriented Eastern society to fall to communism, which is a collective-oriented philosophy.

如果按照马克思本人的说法,俄罗斯是最不可能成为共产主义国家的地方。他相信它只会出现在发达的资本主义工业国家。

俄罗斯是一个文盲、半封建的农民农业国家。它没有工业化。

马克思把共产主义定义为一个没有金钱、没有阶级、没有国家的社会。工人将夺取生产资料并自己控制。“各尽所能,按需分配。”

马克思教导说,自动化会导致失业率达到人民反抗的水平。

列宁知道俄国没有

通过帮助启动您最喜欢的平行链并学习避免诈骗,成为区块链历史的一部分。
了解更多
罗杰·威廉姆斯的头像
 · 
Follow

There is a somewhat popular, romanticized notion that the Bolsheviks overthrew the tsar because he was unjust. This isn’t actually the case. Tsar Nicholas II was a forward looking progressive leader by Russian standards, and promised to be the most liberal tsar in Russian history. Russia wasn’t the UK by any stretch, but it was on a path towards modernization and liberalization that would have been familiar to other western European monarchies.

No, the reason that the Bolsheviks overthrew Nicholas II was because he was weak. The monarchy was easy pickings for anyone looking to take over, and th

约翰·亚历山大的个人资料照片
 · 
Follow

Russia didn’t fall into communism, it fell into ‘state capitalism’, a dystopian marxist nightmare.

The initial stages of capitalism are rough, harsh working conditions, an absolute lack of government assistance; a workers life could be endangered at any moment by a host of issue from the things they were doing to their bosses negligence to their living conditions that created a very poor quality of life in comparison to their owners. Their conditions meant that they had no stable life a lower wage and poorer quality of life despite increased productivity.

For a worker in 1815 to 1914 for workers

And they never leave your side! This Valentine, shop elegant diamond designs with Flat 20% off.
Learn More
Michael Alapaki 的个人资料照片
 · 
Follow

Russia is not like other countries. For a thousand years, they had monarchs, kings, queens, tsars and other dictators. There were the wealthy elite few, and a mass of peasants and common people living under the boot of a totalitarian system—forever.

So generations learned to accept it. They learned how to get along, survive, and possibly thrive, but always within a brutal authoritarian system. Secrecy and paranoia were natural.

In the West, we had 50–60 kingdoms that became 40–50 countries and monarchs gave way to presidents and prime ministers. Russia remained one nation under one family.

The or

The short-lived Hungarian Soviet Republic under Béla Kun was the second Communist state to exist

Colin Riegels 的头像
 · 
Follow

Not 100% sure that is true. Pretty sure that Italy has voted in communist governments and certainly the old Yugoslavia was a communist state independent of Russian influence. Tito and Stalin loathed each other.

Michael Immer 的头像
 · 
Follow

It was never a “communism”. Even communists never called it this way but the West.

The so called October revolution was a coup when provisional government was forcefully displaced by the band consisted from several ideological groups. Bolsheviks, who later changed it to “communists”, were only one of those groups among social revolutionaries, anarchists, Mensheviks, bundists and few others.

Due to political maneuvering, bolsheviks gradually got rid of other parties (it took a few years) and eliminated/prohibited other parties.

Lenin, being a very pragmatic leader, adjusted ideology to situation a

It's amazing that so many people are unaware that the Soviet Union is 30 years gone. So, Russia is not and has not been in any sense communist for a generation.

And Russia is now a capitalist kleptocracy and a fossil fuel platform. Within a few years of the fall of time communism in 1991, all of the state property was in the hands of a couple of hundred oligarchs.

Dima Vorobiev 的头像
 · 
Following

“Why is communism appealing to Russia?”

Communist rule made the pinnacle of Russia’s civilization.


LONGER ANSWER

It’s a solace to great many of us to look back and think that once upon a time we made a difference.

Under Soviet rule, Russia was no longer just a far, cold, vast Kuiper Belt of human habitation.

几十年来,我们成为世界政治的核心。几个世纪以来,绝大多数人都在自给自足的农业中辛勤劳作,我们突然在一代人的一生中为每个人提供了普及教育和医疗保健。

我们赢得了世界大战并将第一个人送入外太空

>俄罗斯曾经是共产主义国家吗?

没有。

从 1922 年到 1991 年,它是一个社会主义共和国。

俄罗斯从来没有共产主义。只有一个据说试图让共产主义发生的共产党。他们从未成功。

5 answers collapsed
 
(Why?)

留言

這個網誌中的熱門文章

北越故事:童年、從軍、戰場、戰後、晚年【平民眼中的戰爭:從香蕉湯到尿袋人生】

投稿:戰爭不是劇本:從香蕉湯到尿袋人生