如果美国想重新获得对最大竞争对手的竞争优势，就需要克服对自由贸易的下意识反对。

 在中国问题上，国会是自己最大的敌人

如果美国想重新获得对最大竞争对手的竞争优势，就需要克服对自由贸易的下意识反对。

Skip to content

Bloomberg

Subscribe

OpinionMihir Sharma

On China, Congress Is Its Own Worst Enemy

If the US wants to regain a competitive edge over its biggest rival, it needs to get over its kneejerk opposition to free trade. 

Even once-protectionist India is opening itself up to cheap imports.

Even once-protectionist India is opening itself up to cheap imports.Photographer: Prashanth Vishwanathan/Bloomberg

ByMihir Sharma+Follow

2023年1月11日 上午6:00 [GMT+8]

Fresh off a leadership election that transfixed the world, the United States House of Representatives is, supposedly, getting down to business. High on the agenda: a bipartisan committee that will examine the possible sources of China’s competitive edge over the US.

I can save the House some time. That committee, if it does its job well, will quickly discover that a large part of the problem is … the U.S. Congress. And, as the past week’s dysfunction showed, that problem is going to get worse.

More from

Bloomberg

Opinion

The World’s Chip Addiction Is Propping Up TSMC

When Terminator Robots Police Loan Markets

Elon Musk's New Year’s Resolution Is to Stop Selling Shares

Japan’s Standing Is Rising. Not So Its Leader’s

The biggest reason China remains central to the economic architecture in much of the world, especially the Indo-Pacific, is the lack of any alternative. Even countries concerned by China’s heavy-handed foreign policies recognize that the country is an essential trading partner. As a source of investment, as an efficient producer and as a potential market, the world’s second-largest economy is impossible to ignore.

And it doesn’t help when the largest seems to have decisively turned its back on economic integration. Forget new trade deals: The US is building walls even against partners in the developing world that it has cultivated for decades. China’s real competitive advantage over the U.S. is that it is the only one competing, while the US closes itself off.

Emblematic of these big, beautiful new American walls is the failure to renew trade measures such as the Generalized System of Preferences and the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill, which singled out countries and sectors for easier tariff treatment. Both measures expired in 2020, costing US businesses billions.

Trade legislation requires experienced advocates in Congress who are willing to work across the aisle and strong party leaders who don’t have to answer to every maverick or lobbyist. After the chaos in the House, the rest of the world would be safe in assuming that neither bipartisanship nor leadership will be much in evidence over the next two years.

Many in Washington don’t care. The age of trade is over, they insist. The Donald Trump wing of the Republican party shares the former president’s doubts about trade deals. Meanwhile, influential Democrats are calling for a “new economic patriotism.” Many of them presumably think the rest of the world has similarly soured on freer trade.

In fact, other countries — including many the US hopes to enlist in its efforts to shore up the liberal world order — do not agree. Despite doubts about the uneven benefits of globalization over the past two decades, other nations have by and large forsworn higher tariff barriers. The European Union continues to push for new or updated trade deals, including with Mexico, Chile and India. New Delhi, long skeptical of trade pacts, has concluded new agreements with Australia and the United Arab Emirates.

The African Continental Free Trade Area is chugging along towards implementation. Expanding membership in the Comprehensive and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership remains at the top of Japan’s geo-economic agenda. And post-Brexit Britain’s hunger for trade agreements with anyone on anything is palpable. Trade skeptics in Washington cannot claim that they are merely acting in line with global trends.

Central to all these efforts is a recognition that global integration is critical to increasing competitiveness and prosperity at home. Leaders in all these nations understand that economic walls promote stagnation and reduce ordinary citizens’ purchasing power.

Unfortunately, too many in the US political class seem to have forgotten that lesson. And their leaders are either, like US President Joe Biden, unwilling to lift a finger for freer trade or, like the GOP’s new House Speaker, too insecure to do so. The same Kevin McCarthy who, as majority leader in 2016, refused to back Trump’s tariffs has now been forced by the anti-woke fringe of his party into refusing even to take a meeting with the pro-trade US Chamber of Commerce.

If Washington can’t agree on an economic proposition to offer the world, the field lies open for China. One analysis of trade data in recent years found that China’s total trade with significant Asian neighbors grew 71% after the Trump tariffs kicked in. Yes, trade with the US also grew during the pandemic, in many cases more than with a locked-down China.

But, if the US political class is serious about containing Chinese influence in the coming decade, it cannot afford to ignore the most potent weapon in its arsenal. China knows how to use its position at the center of the world’s trading networks to increase its power. An isolationist US leadership will only ensure America steadily loses both partners and influence.

More From Bloomberg Opinion:

Europe’s Plan to Tax Carbon at the Border Needs Work: Editorial

North America’s ‘Three Amigos’ Are Out of Tune: Eduardo Porter

China Finds a Place in the US ‘Battery Belt’: Anjani Trivedi

Want more Bloomberg Opinion? OPIN <GO>. Or you can subscribe to our daily newsletter .

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.

To contact the author of this story:

Mihir Sharma at msharma131@bloomberg.net

To contact the editor responsible for this story:

Nisid Hajari at nhajari@bloomberg.net

Share this article

New

Gift this article

Subscriber Benefit

Bloomberg subscribers can gift up to 5 articles a month for anyone to read, even non-subscribers! Learn more

Subscribe

Sign In

Follow the authors

headshot of Mihir Sharma

Mihir Sharma is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. A senior fellow at the Observer Research Foundation in New Delhi, he is author of “Restart: The Last Chance for the Indian Economy.” @mihirssharma

+ Get alerts forMihir Sharma

For you

Based on your reading history and topics you follow

Subway Said to Weigh Potential Sale That Might Top $10 Billion

US Inflation Cools Again, Giving Fed Room to Downshift on Rates

Bond Yields Tumble as Traders Dial Back Fed Wagers: Markets Wrap

Chip Giant TSMC Plans to Cut Spending to Offset Falling Near-Term Sales

Add more topics to your feed

Government

Emerging Markets

Fixed Income

Policy

Monetary Policy

Banking

Central Bankers

Infrastructure

In this article

1473497D

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE/THE

Private Company

Have a confidential tip for our reporters?Get in touch

Before it's here, it's on theBloomberg Terminal

Up Next

China’s Covid-19 Surge Could Make Xi Jinping More Dangerous

Copy Link

OpinionMinxin Pei

China’s Covid Surge Could Make Xi More Dangerous

Like Mao after the Great Leap Forward, the Chinese leader has been wounded. He’s likely to grow more prickly and unpredictable. 

Xi’s triumph at the party congress may be short-lived.&nbsp;

Xi’s triumph at the party congress may be short-lived. Source: Bloomberg

ByMinxin Pei+Follow

2023年1月12日 上午6:00 [GMT+8]

Barely two months ago, one of the biggest questions the world faced was how to deal with an omnipotent Xi Jinping, after the head of the Chinese Communist Party secured a precedent-shattering third term. Now, the world had better start preparing for an even more unsettling prospect: a strongman deeply wounded by his government’s fumbling and chaotic Covid-19 reopening.

Although China’s government has concealed the true human toll of its exit wave of infections, Chinese social media has made clear that the country is reeling from shortages of medicine, overcrowded hospitals and crematoriums inundated with dead bodies.

Copy Link

OpinionGearoid Reidy

China Now Wants the World to Live With the Virus

Ravaged by the virus, Beijing is hitting out at the very countries that could have provided a model for how to exit Covid Zero. 

A test of wills.

A test of wills.Photographer: Jill Connelly/Bloomberg

ByGearoid Reidy+Follow

2023年1月11日 上午10:11 [GMT+8]

In China’s binary view of the pandemic, there can be only zeros and ones — that is, Covid Zero or Covid for Everyone. 

Having scrapped its pandemic policy in an abrupt about-face that it failed to warn the international community was coming, Beijing has now decided that attempts to limit the spread of the virus are unacceptable — even those over which it has no control. President Xi Jinping’s administration has now stopped issuing visas for South Korean and Japanese travelers, after those countries (among others) put in place new curbs when infections started surging through China. With Lunar New Year fast approaching and Chinese citizens able to leave their country for the first time in years, its neighbors have imposed testing requirements on travelers, with Seoul also halting the issuance of some short-term visas, and Japan looking to limit flights. 

Copy Link

Terms of Service Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information Trademarks Privacy Policy ©2023 Bloomberg L.P. All Rights Reserved

Careers Made in NYC Advertise Ad Choices Help