×
The Straits Times
SPH Media Limited
INSTALL
Toggle navigation
Singapore rebuts Richard Branson’s post on drug laws, death penalty, invites him to debate with Shanmugam
The Ministry of Home Affairs said Sir Richard Branson (above) made untrue statements about drug trafficker Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam, who was hanged in April. PHOTO: RICHARD BRANSON/FACEBOOK
Isabelle Liew
PUBLISHED 2022年10月22日 下午8:35 SGT
FacebookWhatsApp
SINGAPORE - The Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) has rebutted British billionaire Richard Branson’s blog post criticising the use of the death penalty to deter drug trafficking, and invited him to a live televised debate with Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam.
Responding to the Oct 10 blog post, MHA said Mr Branson had made untrue statements about Malaysian Nagaenthran K. Dharmalingam, who was hanged in April for drug trafficking. The ministry said Mr Branson also made false assertions about alleged racial bias and the treatment of capital defence lawyers.
Referring to the proposed live televised debate, it said: “Mr Branson may use this platform to demonstrate to Singaporeans the error of our ways and why Singapore should do away with laws that have kept our population safe from the global scourge of drug abuse.”
It added that his flight to and accommodation in Singapore will be paid for.
In Mr Branson’s blog post, he said that Nagaenthran had a “well-documented intellectual disability” and was hanged despite that.
The ministry said on Saturday: “We have clarified on several occasions that this is untrue. The Singapore courts held that Nagaenthran knew what he was doing and that he was not intellectually disabled.
“Mr Branson also suggests that Singapore had breached our international commitments to protect people with disabilities by carrying out the capital punishment on Nagaenthran. This too is untrue, as Nagaenthran was not intellectually disabled.”
ST Readers' Survey
Help us make your news reading experience better
Take our survey
On Mr Branson questioning Singapore’s approach to drugs, including the use of the death penalty on those who traffic large amounts of drugs, the ministry said its priority is to protect Singapore and Singaporeans from the scourge of drugs.
“The capital sentence has had a clear deterrent effect on drug traffickers in Singapore. It has also helped prevent major drug syndicates from establishing themselves here,” it said.
It said that after the mandatory capital sentence was introduced for opium trafficking in 1990, there was a 66 per cent reduction in the average net weight of opium trafficked into Singapore within four years.
In the blog post, Mr Branson said all 11 men executed in Singapore in 2022 were “small-scale traffickers, often of Malay origin or Malaysian nationals”, and that he suspected racial bias.
In response, the ministry said the assertion was false. “Mr Branson probably picked it up from some activists in Singapore with their own agendas. Our laws and procedures apply equally to all, regardless of background, nationality, race, education level or financial status,” it said.
Mr Branson said the “continued harassment” of capital defence lawyers and human rights defenders was “another worrying matter”, and this has a “chilling effect on the willingness of lawyers to represent those on death row”.
Strong support in S’pore, regional cities for death penalty for serious crimes: Studies
'A single hanging of a drug trafficker is a tragedy; a million deaths from drug abuse is a statistic'
MHA said defence lawyers have never been penalised for representing and defending accused persons.
“Every accused person who faces a capital sentence is provided with legal counsel to defend them,” it said.
“However, this does not mean that lawyers can abuse the court process by filing late and patently unmeritorious applications to frustrate the carrying out of lawfully imposed sentences,” it added, citing Nagaenthran’s case where the Court of Appeal dismissed last-minute applications and described them as an abuse of the court’s process.
The ministry said: “Mr Branson is entitled to his opinions. These opinions may be widely held in the UK (Britain), but we do not accept that Mr Branson or others in the West are entitled to impose their values on other societies. Nor do we believe that a country that prosecuted two wars in China in the 19th century to force the Chinese to accept opium imports has any moral right to lecture Asians on drugs.”
Singapore’s policies on drugs and the death penalty are derived from the country’s own experience, it added.
“Nothing we have seen in the UK or in the West persuades us that adopting a permissive attitude towards drugs and a tolerant position on drug trafficking will increase human happiness. Where drug addiction is concerned, things have steadily worsened in the UK, while things have steadily improved in Singapore,” it said.
Singapore has issued similar challenges to foreign critics in the past.
The late New York Times columnist William Safire was invited to a one-to-one debate with then Prime Minister Goh Chok Tong in Singapore in 1995, which he turned down as he insisted on debating with founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew in Switzerland instead.
The invitation came after Mr Safire and another academic at Williams College in Massachusetts opposed the college’s decision to confer an honorary doctorate on Mr Goh. Mr Safire had also criticised Singapore’s trade with Myanmar, as well as attempts to control access to certain websites.
In 1990, Mr Lee challenged journalist and author Bernard Levin to a face-to-face interview on the BBC after the Briton wrote in The Times of London an article that the Government said was a broad attack on Mr Lee, his premiership in Singapore and the judiciary in Singapore.
Although the BBC was prepared to broadcast such a programme, the late Mr Levin declined the interview.
There are good reasons why S'pore is tough on drugs, says Shanmugam in comments on Thai shooting
Convicted trafficker hopes drug sellers will think about impact on families
Stay informed at $9.90/month
Get exclusive reports and insights with more than 500 subscriber-only articles every month
ST One Digital
$9.90/month
No contract
ST app access on 1 mobile device
Subscribe now
Unlock these benefits
All subscriber-only content on ST app and straitstimes.com
Easy access any time via ST app on 1 mobile device
E-paper with 2-week archive so you won't miss out on content that matters to you
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
DEATH PENALTY/CAPITAL PUNISHMENT MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS K SHANMUGAM
FacebookWhatsApp
RECOMMENDED
Serious Warning: “It Doesn’t Matter If You Have $500 In Savings Or $5 Million. Do This Now”Ad
Serious Warning: “It Doesn’t Matter If You Have $500 In Savings Or $5 Million. Do This Now”
Visionary Profit
Four-day Jeju road trip: Food, nature and adventure in Asia’s Hawaii
Four-day Jeju road trip: Food, nature and adventure in Asia’s Hawaii
Incredible toothbrush is all the rage in TaiwanAd
Incredible toothbrush is all the rage in Taiwan
Teeth Care
THE STRAITS TIMES
Available for
iPhones and iPads
Available in
Google Play
E-paper
Podcasts
RSS Feed
Telegram
Youtube
TikTok
SINGAPORE
ASIA
WORLD
OPINION
LIFE
BUSINESS
TECH
SPORT
VIDEOS
PODCASTS
MULTIMEDIA
Terms & Conditions
Data Protection Policy
Need help? Reach us here.
Advertise with us
Sign up for our daily newsletter
Enter your e-mail
Sign up
More newsletters
By registering, you agree to our T&C and Privacy Policy.
MCI (P) 031/10/2021, MCI (P) 032/10/2021. Published by SPH Media Limited, Co. Regn. No. 202120748H. Copyright © 2021 SPH Media Limited. All rights reserved.
留言
張貼留言