中华民国宪法中的领土定义是模糊的叙述。可以随政治意图做不同的解释，这是靠政治智慧与实力。不是冷冰冰的法律。
只要中华民国接受事实，1947颁布宪法、1949退守台湾、1991废除反共临时宪法、1991颁布国家统一纲领、1992共识、2006废除国家统一纲领，领土都是不一样的，问题在于政治后果是什么？
如果台湾不是中华民国的领土，美国和日本没有提出领土要求，只有中华人民共和国提出要求，那台湾一代是中华人民共和国的吗？
台湾地位未定论真的是胡扯？
台湾地位未定论中的台湾是指那些岛屿？
台湾？澎湖？东沙岛？太平岛？金门？马祖？
如果台湾共和国真的依据台湾未定论建国，请问台湾共和国的领土范围是指哪里？
如果只限台灣澎湖，谁去請中华人民共和国接收金门、马祖、东沙岛、太平岛？
台湾共和国会自动放弃金門馬祖这些领土吗？
哈哈哈！
我们就等着看戏吧！
专心喝咖啡吧！
The definition of territory in the Constitution of the Republic of China is a vague narrative. It can be interpreted differently with political intent, which is based on political wisdom and strength. Not cold, hard law.
As long as the ROC accepts the fact that the territory is different when the Constitution was promulgated in 1947, retreated to Taiwan in 1949, abolished the anti-communist interim constitution in 1991, promulgated the national unification program in 1991, consensus in 1992, and abolished the national unification program in 2006, the question is what are the political consequences?
If Taiwan is not the territory of the Republic of China, and the United States and Japan have not made territorial claims, but only the People's Republic of China has, is the Taiwan generation the People's Republic of China?
Is the theory that Taiwan's status is undetermined really nonsense?
What islands does Taiwan mean in the undetermined status theory of Taiwan?
Taiwan? Penghu? Dongsha Island? Taiping Island? Kinmen? Matsu?
If the Republic of Taiwan is really founded on the basis of the undetermined theory of Taiwan, where does the territorial scope of the Republic of Taiwan refer to?
If it is limited to Taiwan's Penghu, who will ask the PRC to take over Kinmen, Matsu, Dongsha Island, and Taiping Island?
Will the Republic of Taiwan automatically give up these territories of Kinmen and Matsu?
Hahahaha!
Let's just wait and see what happens!
Just concentrate on your coffee!
留言
張貼留言