这个问题类似于李约瑟难题，有没有可能也是一个伪命题？
李約瑟難題是一個對於中國歷史發展提出的問題，最早由英國學者李約瑟在1930年代開始研究中國科技史時提出，1976年美國經濟學家肯尼思·博爾丁正式將這個歷史問題稱為「李約瑟難題」（英語：Needham's Grand Question）。其主題是「儘管中國古代對人類科技發展做出了很多重要貢獻，但為什麼科學和工業革命沒有在近代的中國發生？」很多人把李約瑟難題進一步推廣，出現「中國近代科學為什麼落後」、「中國為什麼在近代落後了」等問題，對其爭論一直非常熱烈。「為何科學發生在西方社會？」則是李約瑟問題的反面。
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%8E%E7%BA%A6%E7%91%9F%E9%9A%BE%E9%A2%98
Is it possible that this question, similar to the Joseph Lee conundrum, is also a pseudo-proposition?
The Joseph Lee dilemma is a question posed about the historical development of China, first raised by the British scholar Joseph Lee in the 1930s when he began his research on the history of Chinese science and technology, and formally called the historical question the "Joseph Lee dilemma" (English: Needham's Grand Question) by the American economist Kenneth Boulding in 1976. Its theme was "Why did the scientific and industrial revolution not occur in modern China, despite the many important contributions of ancient China to the development of human science and technology? Many people have further promoted Joseph Lee's problem, and questions such as "Why did China lag behind in modern science" and "Why did China lag behind in modern times" have been hotly debated. "Why did science happen in Western societies? is the flip side of Joseph Li's question.
https://zh.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E6%9D%8E%E7%BA%A6%E7%91%9F%E9%9A%BE%E9%A2%98
留言
張貼留言