美軍贏在後勤

 我在这里读到，二战中的德国士兵认为普通的美国人是可怜的士兵，只是因为后勤方面的优势而获胜，不像英国人那样凶猛勇敢。这是真的吗？是否有他们惧怕/尊重的美国部队？

还有人看到美国和西方大国倾向于看待中国军队的方式与德国人看待美国步兵的方式之间有相似之处吗？看看德国人的下场。

我在这里读到，二战中的德国士兵认为普通的美国人是可怜的士兵，只是因为后勤方面的优势而获胜，不像英国人那样凶猛和勇敢。这是真的吗？有没有他们惧怕/尊重的美国部队？

根据德国老兵的说法，只有少数美国部队真正进入了激烈的战斗状态

一位德国老兵告诉我（后来我在许多报告中看到了这一点），美国人是如何开战的。"首先，日出前没有任何事情发生。从来没有。然后轰炸机来了，用他们的炸弹'耕耘'他们想要征服的土地。当工作完成后，一切都变成了瓦砾，他们又用大炮做了同样的事情--顺便说一句，大炮很出色。一旦瓦砾被磨成灰尘，坦克就来了。数量众多。美国步兵直到相当安全时才出现在战场上。这并不是士兵的错。他们没有被允许更早作战。我们不是鄙视他们，而是羡慕他们！我们希望我们的领导人也能这样对待我们。我们希望我们的领导人能以同样的方式对待我们。"

I have read here that German soldiers in WWII thought the average Americans were poor soldiers and only won because of logistical advantages, unlike the British who were fierce and brave. Is this true? Are there any U.S. units they feared/respected?

Does anyone else see a similarity between and to the way the US and Western powers tend to view China's Military and the way the Germans looked at the US Infantry? And look what happened to the Germans..

I have read here that German soldiers in WWII thought the average Americans were poor soldiers and only won because of logistical advantages, unlike the British who were fierce and brave. Is this true? Are there any U.S. units they feared/respected?

According to German veterans, only a small number of US troops really got Into fierce combat

A German veteran told me (and I read this in many reports later) how the Americans went to war: "First, nothing happened before sunrise. Never. Then the bombers came and 'plowed' the land they wanted to conquer with their Bombs. When the job was done and everything was reduced to rubble, they did the same thing again with the artillery – which was excellent, by the way. As soon as the rubble was ground to dust, the tanks came. In large numbers. The US infantry didn't appear on the battlefield until it was quite safe. It wasn't the soldiers' fault. They weren't allowed to fight sooner. We didn't despise them, we envied them! We wish our leaders had treated us the same way."