日本人可以使用什么策略来赢得珍珠港事件?美国人如何应对突然的海军袭击?

日本人确实赢得了对珍珠港的袭击,击沉了六艘战列舰和两艘驱逐舰,并损坏/瘫痪了三艘战列舰、三艘巡洋舰和几艘小型船只。苍龙号的空袭击沉了退役的战列舰犹他号和一艘布雷舰,并击伤了轻型巡洋舰海伦娜号和罗利号。然后,飞龙号的俯冲轰炸机在一次毁灭性的弹药库爆炸中击沉了战列舰亚利桑那号,而赤城号和加贺号的袭击击沉了战列舰俄克拉荷马号和西弗吉尼亚号,加贺号和苍龙号的飞机击沉了战列舰加利福尼亚号,赤城号的飞机击毁了驱逐舰卡辛号和唐斯号,最后加贺号独自击沉了战列舰内华达号。

1939 年 7 月,飞龙号停泊在横须贺附近。

然而,虽然他们赢得了这场战斗,但他们造成的损失可能比实际损失要大得多。日本航空大队主要专注于击沉敌舰,而忽略了美国广阔的油田,这些油田本可以进行一些燃烧。他们也没有袭击修理厂,这将大大阻止打捞六艘沉没的战列舰(内华达号、加利福尼亚号和西弗吉尼亚号)中的三艘的过程。我还听说有三四艘巡洋舰被送入干船坞进行维修,并暴露在中途岛式的爆炸弹药、燃料和弹药中,但没有一架日本飞机轰炸这些巡洋舰,因为他们都专注于击沉战列舰,摧毁这些巡洋舰确实会对瓜达尔卡纳尔战役有所帮助。

我确信日本人深深后悔没有摧毁重型巡洋舰美国海军旧金山号,尤其是比睿号、古鹰号和吹雪号。

2.5K 次观看
35 人赞同
1 分享
3 条评论
浏览次数:471
查看20 个赞同
Songkhla 的个人资料照片
添加评论...
Andrew MacDonald-Jack 的个人资料照片

归根结底,这是“搬起石头砸自己的脚”,经过计算,美国的反应将是有限的。

公牛战舰沉没,所有战舰都和福特 T 型车一样老。

攻击石油库和修理设施更有意义。

这是徒劳的。特别是北威州订购了科塔斯、爱荷华和航母。更明智的做法是攻击马来亚和荷属东印度群岛,看看罗斯福如何应对

Edgar D. McDonald II 的个人资料照片

非常真实——

Andrew MacDonald-Jack 的个人资料照片
Patrick Mcgroarty 的个人资料照片

更不用说仅有的 4 艘舰队加油船之一,它能够为海上的其他船只加油,但却被忽视了,因为日本人只想像麦克马洪那样攻击军舰。那艘加油船在珊瑚海被击沉,但只是在为航母加油之后,这使得这些航母能够停留足够长的时间与日本人交战,这意味着日本在中途岛只有 4 艘航母,而不是 6 艘。

Edgar D. McDonald II 的个人资料照片

珍珠港事件是日本人寻求的经典马汉式战役。他们称之为“艦隊決戰”。摧毁美国战线,美国寻求条件。

正如德拉奇尼费尔所说——

就像狗追车一样,如果狗追上了车,那它要怎么办呢?

山本五十六抓住了他的车。

美国不想讨论条款。

好的,那么现在怎么办???


Well the Japanese did win the attack on Pearl Harbor, sinking six battleships and two destroyers, and damaging/crippling three battleships, three cruiser, and a few smaller vessels. Air attacks from Soryu sank the decommissioned battleship Utah and a minelayer, and crippled the light cruisers Helena and Raleigh. Then dive bombers from Hiryu sank the battleship Arizona in a devastating magazine explosion while attacks from Akagi and Kaga sank the battleships Oklahoma and West Virginia, planes from Kaga and Soryu sank the battleship California, planes from Akagi wrecked the destroyers Cassin and Downes, and finally Kaga alone sank the battleship Nevada.

Hiryu anchored off Yokosuka in July of 1939.

However, while they won the battle, they could have inflicted far more damage than they actually did. Mostly, the Japanese air groups were mostly focused on sinking enemy ships, and ignored the vast US oil fields that could have used some burning. They also didn’t hit the repair yards, and which would have significantly halted the process of raising three of the six battleships sunk (Nevada, California, and West Virginia). I’ve also heard that there were a good three or four cruisers which were drydocked for repairs, and were exposed to explosive ammunition, fuel, munitions Midway style, but none of the Japanese aircraft blasted those cruisers as they were all focused on sinking battleships, and destroying those cruisers really would have helped out with the Guadalcanal campaign.

I’m pretty sure the Japanese deeply regretted not destroying the heavy cruiser USS San Francisco, especially IJN Hiei, Furutaka, and Fubuki.

2.5K views
35 upvotes
1 share
3 comments
471 views
View 20 upvotes
Profile photo for Songkhla
Add a comment...
Profile photo for Andrew MacDonald-Jack

Ultimately was a “shot in the foot”, a risk calculated the US response would be limited.

Ox battlrshipy sunk, all were as about as old as a Ford Model T.

Attacking the oil depots & repair facilities made more sense.

It was fruitess. Esp with thd nrw DKotas, Iowas & carriers on order. More sense in just attacking Malaya & Dutch East Indies & seeing how FDR respondef

Profile photo for Edgar D. McDonald II

so very true-

Profile photo for Andrew MacDonald-Jack
Profile photo for Patrick Mcgroarty

Also not to mention one of only 4 fleet oilers capable of refueling other ships at sea that was sitting on battleship row but ignored because the Japanese only wanted to attack warships McMahon style. That oiler was sunk at Coral Sea, but only AFTER refueling the carriers which allowed those carriers to stay on station long enough to engage the Japanese to a draw which meant Japan only had 4 carriers at Midway instead of 6.

Profile photo for Edgar D. McDonald II

Pearl Harbor was the classic Mahan inspired battle the Japanese sought. They called it the Kantei Kissen. Destroy the US battle line, and the US seeks terms.

It was just like Drachinifel said-

It was like the dog that chased the car. What is the dog going to do with the car if he catches it?

Yamamoto caught he car.

The US didn’t want to discuss terms.

OK, so now what????


#####$$$$$$$$$+-+--+(


What strategies could the Japanese have used to win at Pearl Harbor? How could the Americans have countered the surprise naval attack?

Well the Japanese did win the attack on Pearl Harbor, sinking six battleships and two destroyers, and damaging/crippling three battleships, three cruiser, and a few smaller vessels. Air attacks from Soryu sank the decommissioned battleship Utah and a minelayer, and crippled the light cruisers Helena and Raleigh. Then dive bombers from Hiryu sank the battleship Arizona in a devastating magazine explosion while attacks from Akagi and Kaga sank the battleships Oklahoma and West Virginia, planes from Kaga and Soryu sank the battleship California, planes from Akagi wrecked the destroyers Cassin and Downes, and finally Kaga alone sank the battleship Nevada.



Hiryu anchored off Yokosuka in July of 1939.


However, while they won the battle, they could have inflicted far more damage than they actually did. Mostly, the Japanese air groups were mostly focused on sinking enemy ships, and ignored the vast US oil fields that could have used some burning. They also didn’t hit the repair yards, and which would have significantly halted the process of raising three of the six battleships sunk (Nevada, California, and West Virginia). I’ve also heard that there were a good three or four cruisers which were drydocked for repairs, and were exposed to explosive ammunition, fuel, munitions Midway style, but none of the Japanese aircraft blasted those cruisers as they were all focused on sinking battleships, and destroying those cruisers really would have helped out with the Guadalcanal campaign.



I’m pretty sure the Japanese deeply regretted not destroying the heavy cruiser USS San Francisco, especially IJN Hiei, Furutaka, and Fubuki.


Ultimately was a “shot in the foot”, a risk calculated the US response would be limited.


Ox battlrshipy sunk, all were as about as old as a Ford Model T.


Attacking the oil depots & repair facilities made more sense.


It was fruitess. Esp with thd nrw DKotas, Iowas & carriers on order. More sense in just attacking Malaya & Dutch East Indies & seeing how FDR respondef


so very true-


Also not to mention one of only 4 fleet oilers capable of refueling other ships at sea that was sitting on battleship row but ignored because the Japanese only wanted to attack warships McMahon style. That oiler was sunk at Coral Sea, but only AFTER refueling the carriers which allowed those carriers to stay on station long enough to engage the Japanese to a draw which meant Japan only had 4 carriers at Midway instead of 6.


Pearl Harbor was the classic Mahan inspired battle the Japanese sought. They called it the Kantei Kissen. Destroy the US battle line, and the US seeks terms.


It was just like Drachinifel said-


It was like the dog that chased the car. What is the dog going to do with the car if he catches it?


Yamamoto caught he car.


The US didn’t want to discuss terms.


OK, so now what????

沒有留言:

張貼留言

注意:只有此網誌的成員可以留言。

選擇汪精衛中華帝國會像奧匈帝國鄂圖曼土耳其帝國一樣戰敗解體

選擇汪精衛 中華帝國會像奧匈帝國鄂圖曼土耳其帝國一樣戰敗解體 因為站錯了隊伍 北洋軍閥頭腦比汪精衛清楚 所以一戰才能拿回山東 孫文拿德國錢,他是反對參加一戰 選擇蔣介石, 中國將淪為共產主義國家 因為蔣介石鬥不過史達林 蔣介石即使打贏毛澤東 中國一樣會解體 中國是靠偽裝民族主義的...